We have to separate private conversations from what actually occurred. We already knew that Giuliani was in Ukraine at Trump’s direction to find out how the corruption in 2016 was meant to derail his candidacy. And in any event they got the military aid they needed and the Ukraine president now says there was on coercion. So any private discussion in-house prior to or after conversations with the new Ukraine president was just that — conversations as to the best way to bring out info on how the corruption occurred and maybe use it in the future if Biden is the candidate in 2020. Perfectly acceptable in my opinion.
“Perfectly acceptable in my opinion.”
Yes, but the optics are terrible, and that is what the rats are banking on. ALL politicians, no matter what party, are concerned about optics and how they affect themselves.
Nice summary.
These guys think there thinking and opinions override the presidents responsibility to ensure our tax dollars are not funneled to the wrong people , including back to the families of representatives. I.E Biden , Kerry etc