And yet, Schiffty is still in charge of the circus. I'm wondering, after the curtain closes on the witch hunt, can Eric Ciaramella be charged for providing false information? Maybe so...
A whole bunch of rat 🐀 bastards should face the music.
I’m sure Barr will get right on it...
The whistleblower, by accusing Trump of malpractice, has essentially inoculated himself against prosecution. Going after him would be portrayed as retaliation and, even though deserved, is not worth the grief that pursuing him would bring.
It sucks, but that’s the way things work.
Pretty much explains why Schiff lies yesterday about he and his staff not knowing the name of the whistleblower.
The idea that Schitt doesn’t know who the wb is....is ridiculous. Someone went to his office, spoke with his people anonymously? With what...a mask....a stocking over his head. He must have been known to get by the front desk.
Nuthin' another retroactive rule change can't take care of. The precedent has already been set. If this ass**** doesn't follow the rules, change 'em...
Now if he was a Christian who prayed for a homosexual, well then - 25 years to life.
“May have”? How come no one ever seems to actually KNOW when a Dem has broken the law?
Aw C’mon, these manufactured “felonies” only in DC, I am a lawyer, maybe not a brilliant one, but I can’t see these weird scenarios as felonies.
“Because the whistleblower never disclosed his contacts with Schiff and the House Intelligence Committee (of which Schiff is chairman), the intelligence committee inspector general (ICIG) testified that he had no knowledge of the improper contacts. So he never looked into it.”
Why can’t the CIA Director ask the AG to undertake another review, this time ascertaining who changed the whistleblower rules (and for what reason) just before the whistleblower came forward.