Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neil Young says his US citizenship application is being held up because he uses marijuana
CNN ^ | 11/11/19 | Harmeet Kaur

Posted on 11/11/2019 5:46:51 PM PST by DallasBiff

Neil Young wants to become a US citizen and vote in the 2020 presidential election.

But the Canadian singer-songwriter says his citizenship application is being held up because he uses marijuana. "When I recently applied for American citizenship, I passed the test. It was a conversation where I was asked many questions. I answered them truthfully and passed," Young said in a statement on his Neil Young Archives website. "Recently however, I have been told that I must do another test, due to my use of marijuana and how some people who smoke it have exhibited a problem."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cannabis; neilyoung
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: M-cubed

Keep on rockin’ in the freee wooorld...


81 posted on 11/12/2019 5:37:44 AM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

He’s been living here since the late 60’s, and he’s just getting around to this now?


82 posted on 11/12/2019 6:36:20 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
US law does not require a person to formally lose their foreign citizenship to become a US citizen. The intention to keep a foreign citizenship certainly is not legal grounds to deny an application for naturalization.

Naturalization does require the following oath:

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; ...

In practice, this is taken to mean that in the case of any conflict in responsibilities between your US citizen and any other citizenship, the US responsibilities must be considered first.

83 posted on 11/12/2019 6:55:47 AM PST by billakay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: BobL
It is not considered voter fraud to vote in two *national* elections if you have dual-citizenship. There is legally a *huge* difference between voting in both the US and Canada and voting in NY and Florida.

In fact, a dual-citizen living in the USA can typically vote in their other country of citizenship by visiting the closest embassy.

84 posted on 11/12/2019 7:01:04 AM PST by billakay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Try even entering Canada with a DWI conviction as an American citizen, Neil.

Stop whining. It’s illegal in most of this country.

You made that choice. Marijuana is more important to you than US citizenship.


85 posted on 11/12/2019 7:05:12 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billakay

I know...but like the Left, I’ll claim it’s so!


86 posted on 11/12/2019 7:15:17 AM PST by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
All these years and now he suddenly wants to be a citizen! 😡 "A southern man don't need him around anyhow"
87 posted on 11/12/2019 7:39:57 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billakay

No dual voters. All of this immigrant dual citizen crapola is less than 30 years old.


88 posted on 11/12/2019 8:01:21 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Recall that unqualified Hillary Clinton sat on the board of Wal-Mart when Bill Clinton was governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: billakay

Mexico encourages Mexicans to vote in both countries.


89 posted on 11/12/2019 8:02:28 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Recall that unqualified Hillary Clinton sat on the board of Wal-Mart when Bill Clinton was governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I think he has 2 sons with mental disorders.


90 posted on 11/12/2019 8:38:50 AM PST by subterfuge (RIP T.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

I knew he got involved because he had a child with developmental / mental problems. I didn’t know it was two kids.

No matter what you think about somebody’s politics, that is an incredibly hard thing to deal with in life (personal experience) and what he has done with the Bridge School is to be commended.


91 posted on 11/12/2019 11:24:57 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Can’t blame him for wanting to get access to American Healthcare, he qualifies for Medicare now and he wouldn’t have to wait months to get a doctor’s appointment.


92 posted on 11/12/2019 11:29:16 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Agreed.


93 posted on 11/12/2019 12:35:15 PM PST by subterfuge (RIP T.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I always think of his cat when I hear his name.

https://youtu.be/XToff3LSJ_8


94 posted on 11/12/2019 12:39:54 PM PST by CJ Wolf (Freedom, if you can keep it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
The Supreme Court struck down all laws prohibiting dual-citizenship in 1967. In practice it is hard to require across the board, as many counties simply do not provide a mechanism for loss for citizenship. For example, Ukraine refuses (just out of stubbornness) to provide a mechanism for loss of citizenship for those who want to naturalize as Russian citizens. Russian law (which ordinarily requires at least an effort to lose a prior citizenship to naturalize) had to be revised to deal with this idiocy.

It is also perfectly legal for a US citizen (natural or otherwise) to naturalize in another country and maintain their US citizenship.

95 posted on 11/12/2019 12:44:23 PM PST by billakay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

He’s rich enough he can see any doctor he wants at any time with almost no wait. I doubt very much he is looking for access to Medicare.


96 posted on 11/12/2019 12:49:17 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: billakay

Time was enlisting with a foreign army or voting in a foreign election could negate a birthright citizenship.

And certainly foreign nationals who ‘became’ Americans could lose that claim to American citizenship if they continued to vote in foreign elections.

But Estados Stupidios likes diminishing claims at sovereign status.

It’s been a rapid decline of enforcement in the past thirty years but no laws have changed. Same with illegal immigration.


97 posted on 11/12/2019 1:08:30 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Recall that unqualified Hillary Clinton sat on the board of Wal-Mart when Bill Clinton was governor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
I would say it is just because he has nothing to contribute.
98 posted on 11/12/2019 1:13:55 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (A hero is a hero no matter what medal they give him. Likewise a schmuck is still a schmuck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

The laws are pretty clear regarding this. The only acts along those lines that are automatically expatriating are enlisting in a foreign military *engaged in active hostilities against the USA*, and accepting a policy-level office under another nations government (e.g. president, a cabinet minister, etc.). There are other “potentially expatriating acts” but these must be done *with the intention of losing US citizenship*. If the individuals intention is to remain a US citizen, the law is very clear. There is no loss of citizenship. It is not a question of enforcement or discretion. It is the US code.


99 posted on 11/12/2019 1:15:02 PM PST by billakay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
He’s rich enough he can see any doctor he wants at any time with almost no wait. I doubt very much he is looking for access to Medicare.

I guess it's the free college that is attracting him then.

100 posted on 11/12/2019 1:27:42 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson