Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zhang Fei

I thought aircraft carriers were siting ducks and not part of the latest military naval technology.


2 posted on 11/11/2019 4:53:02 PM PST by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim W N

In a war with a first world country, I wouldn’t count on the carrier being there when the strike sortie comes back.


8 posted on 11/11/2019 4:57:52 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N

They’ll last as long as they stay way to hell out of harms way. If they dont, they will go down to the bottom.

This isnt WW2 times where they could hide and it took hours for the enemy to find them and sink them.

Twenty or more aircraft with air to ship missiles and its over.

As far as the Red Chinese? They could give a rip about their pilots lives so they’ll send as many as they think will do the trick.


23 posted on 11/11/2019 5:28:03 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N

You left off the sarcasm tag.


32 posted on 11/11/2019 6:06:11 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N

“I thought aircraft carriers were siting ducks and not part of the latest military naval technology.”

Maybe the Chicoms plan to slap around some third worlders neocon style.
Bill Kristol is going to be so jealous!


51 posted on 11/11/2019 7:22:05 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N
I thought aircraft carriers were siting ducks and not part of the latest military naval technology.

Aircraft carriers are great for pounding smaller/weaker countries due to their ability to effectively project force. This means that China intends to be able to project force to smaller/weaker countries.

62 posted on 11/11/2019 10:09:05 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jim W N

“I thought aircraft carriers were siting ducks and not part of the latest military naval technology.”

Well, yes and no. We could argue about the survivability of carriers in an all-out war using ICBM’s and maneuverable reentry vehicles. We would both probably agree the losses would be horrendous. But the US is China’s least concern. They have had several wars with Vietnam since our war ended in the seventies. Each time, Vietnam has handed them a defeat. China is rapidly building infrastructure to correct the reasons for their loses. In addition, with the US’ gradual withdrawal from the peace keeping role in the Persian Gulf, China will need to protect oil shipments from there all the way to China. Those shipments will need to pass several choke points and hostile countries who could hold the oil for ransom. The faster the US withdraws from its role as World Police, the faster China must ramp up its navy to take up the slack.

On another tact, China has the most over-leveraged big economy in the world. I would argue that their navy build-up will never be completed before their economy implodes.


71 posted on 11/12/2019 3:37:07 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson