You are the one who is jumping to a conclusion, that being my motivation. It had nothing to do with whether you supported President Trump. It was solely my mining to determine if you believed the nonsense this guy was stating in his article. These pseudo intellectuals that bring forth propaganda like this to the people are quite devious in their methods. Was making sure you were not fooled by these machinations he put forth.
But you are the one who brings out the skepticism when you constantly post articles whose purpose is to undermine the truth to push a fictitious narrative, and then say nothing. That silence coupled with repeatedly posting dubious articles has apparently caused many others to engage you to examine your motivation as well. If that bothers you, then quell the questions by letting people know what you think of what you post. A mind faced with speculation can bring forth dangerous & incorrect conclusions. Neither of us want that. 8>)
RE: Now you are reading into the argument something I did not broach or even imply.
Please re-read my post to which you replied. I never said anything about you. It was a post IN GENERAL about those who accuse me of being anti-Trump.
When I said: “Before accusing me of always posting articles that are unflattering of Trump, READ MY OTHER POSTS that DO support him.” I wasn’t talking about YOU. I was talking about other posters.
RE: But you are the one who brings out the skepticism when you constantly post articles whose purpose is to undermine the truth to push a fictitious narrative, and then say nothing.
Again, I am not required to say anything. I already explained what my purpose is if I don’t comment about an article I posted. I want to elicit comments and refutations from FReepers. THAT is my motivation.
If you want to be skeptical of my motivations, it’s up to you. I can’t control what you think or want to think. I can only explain my motives and I just did.