Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox’s Chris Wallace says Republicans are ‘having trouble with the facts’ of impeachment
conservativeinstitute ^ | October 26, 2019

Posted on 10/27/2019 4:03:49 PM PDT by MarvinStinson

Fox News’ Chris Wallace just shocked viewers by going on an anti-Trump rant.

This past week, House Republicans stormed a closed-door impeachment hearing with complaints about a lack of transparency. It was these same Republicans that Wallace went after during an appearance he made on “America’s Newsroom” on Friday.

There, host Sandra Smith had Wallace listen to a video clip in which White House adviser Kellyanne Conway asked, “Where’s the process?”

“My feeling is that if you are having trouble with the facts, you argue process,” responded Wallace, who seems all too ready to take the Democrats’ side. “That’s what Republicans are doing right now.”

The implication, of course, is that the facts are against President Donald Trump, that they seem to indicate that Trump is guilty of a quid pro quo between himself and Ukranian president Volodymyr Zelensky. This being the case, Wallace argues, all Republicans can do is try to get the inquiry thrown out by arguing that the process is unfair.

Before viewers get the idea that Wallace has a personal ax to grind, he cited the supposedly damning evidence that the Democrats have against Trump.

“The Democrats have gotten some very damaging information from people like William Taylor, the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine; Fiona Hill, who used to be one of the top advisers of the National Security Council on Ukraine,” he said, “evidence that seems to tie more of a quid pro quo, that there is some evidence from these people working in the Trump administration that the president linked aid to Ukraine, a White House meeting with Ukrainian president, to getting research on the Democrats.”

Wallace then likened the impeachment inquiry to the Benghazi hearings.

“In the Benghazi investigation, there were private hearings and then there were public hearings,” he said. “That’s what’s going to happen here.”

“I just think that in the end after we have these little must-see TV hearings with these key witnesses in public in November,” Wallace continued, “I’m not sure people are going to care a lot about what the process was in October.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; coup; wallacw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last
To: MarvinStinson

Chris is a sh##head jim


81 posted on 10/27/2019 7:23:53 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (nic dip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

I’ve been done with Wallace for a long time. Never watch him.


82 posted on 10/27/2019 7:27:23 PM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Exactly, that term is so misused here. Deals always have trade offs, always. Otherwise, what’s the reason for any deals at all?

You give us something because... Because what? Even if Trump implied their aid might be in jeopardy, big deal. I’d bet the farm you could find that kind of thing in every deal a president has ever made on foreign policy. Obama sent pallets of taxpayer cash off in the middle of the night as part of a deal. Now that’s quid pro quo.

All they even have in the transcript is Trump asking for a favor, not demanding one. Big F’n deal.


83 posted on 10/27/2019 7:30:37 PM PDT by Bullish (My tagline ran off with another man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

When Chris Wallace appears on a FOX program, I switch my TV off.

Who needs to listen to foolish Democrat “talking points”?


84 posted on 10/27/2019 7:43:56 PM PDT by pfony1 (Al Democrats LIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2
except Trump was asking a foreign leader to investigate a political opponent.

Nope, there is a treaty, signed by I believe Clinton that REQUIRES either country to examine and explain ANY illegal activity involved......Trump's doing just that.

85 posted on 10/27/2019 7:53:37 PM PDT by terycarl (Notre Dame was God's way of pointing out that France has fallen from His favor....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: aspasia

not know.....


86 posted on 10/27/2019 8:26:58 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
"Chris Wallace, a man who tries to substitute smugness for intelligence"


87 posted on 10/27/2019 8:27:00 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

88 posted on 10/27/2019 8:29:59 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Agree


89 posted on 10/27/2019 8:31:55 PM PDT by Bigg Red (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Wow, Beany and Cecil. I am getting old!


90 posted on 10/27/2019 8:59:26 PM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Chris Wallace is the same smirking, snarky liberal sh!t his old man was.


91 posted on 10/27/2019 11:33:01 PM PDT by jmacusa ("If wisdom is not the Lord, what is wisdom?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Facts, what facts? Democrats make them up. There’s no due process in the Star Chamber proceeding they’re running.

That Chris Wallace endows it with legitimacy says a lot more about him than it does about Trump.


92 posted on 10/28/2019 4:24:44 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
Kick-worthy head.
93 posted on 10/28/2019 8:50:21 AM PDT by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Thank you.


94 posted on 10/28/2019 8:50:55 AM PDT by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson