Posted on 10/18/2019 9:50:36 AM PDT by jazusamo
Law enforcement officials who have previously been critical of gun control measures now have harsh words for Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke after he proposed police go home-to-home in order to confiscate AR-15s from American citizens.
O'Rourke was pressed on MSNBC after the fourth Democratic debate on what would be done if someone is not willing to sell their AR-15 to the government, as he suggested.
"Yeah, I think just as in any law that is not followed or flagrantly abused, there have to be consequences or else there is no respect for the law," O'Rourke replied. "So you know, in that case I think there would be a visit by law enforcement to recover that firearm and to make sure that it is purchased, bought back so that it cannot be potentially used against somebody else."
"Mr. O’Rourke is delusional in regards to his gun control ideas," San Juan County Sheriff Shane Ferrari told Townhall, pointing to how the former Texas Senate candidate has gone from allowing people to keep their AR-15s to now wanting to send police to take them away.
"The biggest fear of any free society is the government at your door wanting to take away your rights by force. I do not see the men and women of law enforcement sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution doing this," Ferrari continued."In an act of desperation, Mr. O’Rourke is shamefully using tragedies our country has experienced and fear for his political gain. The very foundation of law enforcement is public trust. Frankly, no one should trust a man who talks out of both sides of his mouth."
"I'm not sure whether his statements are naive or just plain ignorant and arrogant. Maybe it's all three," said Eddy County Sheriff Mark Cage. "The thought of anyone utilizing my sheriff's office or any other law enforcement agency in this country as their personal Gestapo to go door to door violating citizen's rights is disgusting, unrealistic and downright un-American."
Cage is concerned if any law enforcement agency participates in O'Rourke's plan on a large scale, "bloodshed would be inevitable," adding that "some of my constituents are already adopting the mantra of 'Come take mine Beto!'...His rhetoric has gotten old and I look forward to the day when he shuts up."
Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams told Towhnall he also would have concerns for the safety of his deputies because it would be an "unconstitutional" order and would put them "in the crosshairs."
"I think that you have to be concerned for the safety of the citizen [too] because, at that point, they don't know if law enforcement is coming to protect them or disarm them and that creates a very tense situation."
Reams said he does not know how a candidate would think they would be able to order local police to carry out confiscation if they became president, adding, "I think [Beto] is sorely mistaken if he thinks law enforcement is going to willingly agree to go down that path."
Commenting on the backlash that followed after O'Rourke's comments on Wednesday, Lauren Hitt, his national rapid response director, maintained he would not "send officers door to door to collect weapons - just as we do not send the IRS door to door to collect taxes."
While sheriffs are more willing to oppose gun control laws they deem as being unconstitutional, some law enforcement organizations, such as the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), have voiced support for an "assault weapons" ban.
IACP did not return Townhall's request for comment on O'Rourke's proposal.
The answer, of course, is the government can't do either of these things.
It's just the liberals trying to use "less threatening" language than Beto uses when he talks about swat teams storming your house to take your guns.
For a time, the Left used the phrase "gun safety" laws instead of gun control for the same reason. It sounds "nicer". I mean, who could be against gun safety?
Federal law so it'd have to be federal law enforcement. Local police cannot be compelled to enforce federal law.
“Follow lawful orders.”
Your rank and file LEO’s know that law-abiding gun owners are the best friends that they have in the Urban Jungle.
Yeah....you’d think a guy with a high school diploma that cost $200K would be more grounded. /s
Great post, Dave!
Thanks
Thanks, old FRiend!
Understood Exactly what would happen in USA too
The commie-D’s have have have to realize this will definitely be the result of their agitations. They cannot be that stupid, even ticks are smarter than that. So, it’s obvious they want it. Perhaps they figure they can impose their dictatorship by force anyway? ( I doubt the American people would permit it, but this must be their plan as there’s no other possibility ). Prepare to defend yourself friends family and community ! Pray they won’t try it but be prepared just in case
Union boss pukes...
Guaranteed to never be within rifle shot of any scene where they send their "Brethren" into the inevitable firestorm -- just to violate the Constitution.
How long will it take those 'lowly' "Brethren" to decide to keep their heads down -- and return home safely to their families -- or to simply refuse the assignment?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
(Be assured, the smarter of them have already begun calculating the odds of surviving repeated confiscations...)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.