Notice that they don’t talk about states like Illinois where Chicago decides the winner? If anything, the EC should be strengthened. Make it where the winner of that state has to win the most counties.
Notice that they don’t talk about states like Illinois where Chicago decides the winner? If anything, the EC should be strengthened. Make it where the winner of that state has to win the most counties.
THIS IS AN EXTREMELY EXCELLENT IDEA. WE SHOULD GET BEHIND THIS GREAT SOLUTION
Maybe we should just rename the country "California".. Or more accurately, Mexiafornia...
‘Make it where the winner of that state has to win the most counties.’
not counties; congressional districts...
In Connecticut, it would be most towns since we don’t have counties... If it happened, the small towns would be more powerful than Hartford, Bridgeport, New Haven and Mansfield...
Since the EC is based on congressional districts plus one for each Senator, Why not give the E.C. vote to the winner in each dist. Then the two for Senators could go to the popular vote winner in that state. Example: IN two has more Republican votes for Potus than dem. The Republican candidate would get that electoral vote. If the Rep. Candidate carries the state he/she would get the 2 votes allocated for each Senator.