Glad Clarice is on our side.
1 posted on
10/13/2019 5:47:41 AM PDT by
upchuck
To: 5th MEB; Albion Wilde; bitt; BlackAdderess; bobfeland; burghguy; Cheerio; ComputerGuy; ...
Clarice Feldman ping.If you'd like to be on or off the Clarice Feldman ping list, usually issued only on Sunday morning, please click Private Reply below and drop me a FReepmail.
2 posted on
10/13/2019 5:48:32 AM PDT by
upchuck
(Democraps say the President is out of control. They mean the President of out of THEIR control.)
To: upchuck
I have a simple question for the “whistleblower”.
Which is more dangerous:
(1) Keeping your anonymity and taking a midnight stroll in SE Washington DC?
(2) Revealing your identity while living in your posh DC suburb.
3 posted on
10/13/2019 6:05:03 AM PDT by
cgbg
(Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
To: upchuck
Perhaps he could testify via text messages, or
wait, even better
via tweets. Too damn funny. I welcome the testimony - but only if it is rendered in Haiku form...
4 posted on
10/13/2019 6:05:18 AM PDT by
rockrr
( Everything is different now...)
To: upchuck
It's now officially a Stalin show trial in Freedonia, if you get my gist. 😉😆
5 posted on
10/13/2019 6:50:41 AM PDT by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
To: upchuck
The more this RAT fiasco unravels the more fun it is to watch.
Another good one from Clarice.
7 posted on
10/13/2019 8:47:16 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: upchuck
Very good write up of the corrupt Democrats, but as we all know, this is but the tip of the iceberg.
To: upchuck
10 posted on
10/13/2019 10:24:59 AM PDT by
Fedora
To: upchuck; piasa
Clarice links to this interesting tweet: "
If it turns out Eric Ciaramella is Schiffs informant, people ought to know that Billionaire Clinton donor Victor Pinchuk sent 🇺🇦 MP Bielkova to meet with him same day she met with David Kramer and kicked Steele Dossier operation into high gear. ie Whistleblower = Dossier 2.0":
Seamus Bruner
11 posted on
10/13/2019 10:31:58 AM PDT by
Fedora
To: upchuck
“The real reason for this backoff, I think, is that once his identity is confirmed, it will be clear this was a stupid setup by amateurs in Congress who wanted to cover their tracks.”
No, the real reason the leaker doesn’t want to be identified is because they would have to appear before the various House committees and be subjected to Republican questions and either answer truthfully or commit perjury, questions such as:
1. How many people contributed to the writing of this document?
2. How many people helped you do this?
3. How many times did you meet with Schiff staff and/or committee remembers?
4. Who did you meet on Schiff’s committe or staff?
5. How much did Schiff committee members and/or staff help you with this?
6. How many sources did you have?
7. Who are your sources?
8. Who are the White House staff who provided you information?
etc.
12 posted on
10/13/2019 11:40:05 AM PDT by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: upchuck
The "whistleblower" wants to give his testimony by a letter.
As Sam Ervin said during the height of the Watergate investigation, "You can't cross-examine a piece of paper."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson