Posted on 10/03/2019 6:42:26 AM PDT by libstripper
Full title of article:
"Former CIA Director John Brennan Reveals He will be Interviewed by US Attorney John Durham in Coming Days"
Excerpt:
Former CIA Director under Barack Obama, Trump-hater and the suspected architect of the Spygate scandal, will be questioned by US Attorney John Durham in the coming days.
Brennan told Nicole Wallace on MSNBC that he is supposedly going to be interviewed by US Attorney John Durham but that he just doesnt understand why there is an active investigation on the Obama administrations spying on the opposition candidate in the 2016 election.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
He just needs to take a couple of zip strips in his pocket, in case. I think Brennan is the Deep State leader of all this intelligence agency/FBI BS.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No that would be obunghole!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
so, who is giving jihadi john & obunhole their marching orders????
My guess would be the Muzzie Brohood represented here by don’tCAIR:-)
There is a slew of apparently illegal activity over the past 3 or 4 years, and no one has been prosecuted (no reasonable prosecute excuse, etc.). Justice delayed is of course, justice denied.
George
Jihad Johnny is getting his fatwa from Soretoro and his Jihadi Handler, ValJar.,
Under oath?
I hope the names Brennan and Comey will be remembered as long a Benedict Arnold. Treason should not be forgotten.
I agree. Given our culture, I fear Lewinski will be remembered long past Brennan/Comey.
:::::so, who is giving jihadi john & obunghole their marching orders????:::::
Jihad Johnny is getting his fatwa from Soretoro and his Jihadi Handler, ValJar.,
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
you could be hovering over the targets!
Hard to know if Brennan is more like Hassani Sabbah, the Muslim originator of the so-called Assassins or Robespierre, the Machiavellian Cardinal of the French Revolution.
Both were devoted to undermining the government and anyone who thought differently. Or what about Cassius, the Roman official who was part of the cabal that assassinated Caesar.
This is a duplicated response that was originally posted to the thread BeauBo posted at 6:44 am on this topic...
...
I have been waiting, not so patiently to begin eating popcorn. Now is the time. Why? If the DOJ ask questions that have three qualities required, it is game full on. If not, the DOJ will admit they are just fishing and have nothing. The 1st is that, the DOJ already are convinced they have the evidence for the answer to the question. The 2nd is that the DOJ is convinced there is evidence proving Brennan also knows the answer. 3rd is that the DOJ is convinced that that Brennan knows that the DOJ already has the answer to the question. If Brennan answers a question truthfully, it only confirms the DOJs position, unless there is a Hail Mary truthful answer the DOJ did not account for. If Brennan answers untruthfully, it is perjury. At this point, barring the Hail Mary, there is nothing Brennan can do other than confirm the DOJ conclusions or commit perjury. Since the DOJ already knows Brennan knows the answer any response such as pleading the 5th, amnesia or such confirms the DOJ position. From Brennans position, perjury is probably going to look the preferred outcome at this stage. Let the reveal party begin.
Somebody supplied $10,000 in order to trap Papadopoulus at the U.S. port of entry and accuse him of such a serious crime that they would get George to lie about Trump. Could it be Brennan?
Somebody arranged for Downer to claim that George told him that the Russians had Hillary's emails. Could it be Brennan?
Somebody sent Vesilnitskaya to Trump Tower in order to compromise Donald Junior. Could it be Brennan?
Somebody suggested that Steele create a fake dossier and feed the information to the FBI so as to "justify" an investigation. Could it be Brennan?
Somebody arranged for Nellie Ohr to work with Steele and deliver fake information to her husband in the Justice Department in order to justify FISA warrants. Could it be Brennan?
I think there may be a lot of questions that Brennan could answer. I wonder if he takes Comey's approach. That is, admit everything but suggest that "Orange Man Bad" justified all his actions.
I need to check my popcorn supply.
I’m sure he’ll have no compunction about lying his butt off. He’s made a career of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.