[Bob434]

unconstitutional- governments can’t just ban things when there is no evidence it is causing harm- The harm is from OTHER substances- not the flavored flavors- This will very likely go to SC, as it violates a company’s right ot market products have been used since 2001 with no ill effects to speak of, and which have helped millions of people quit something that actually DOES kill people- tobacco cigarettes- - the harm is coming from just certain products like THC- not flavored juices-

The state can try to make the case that flavored juices are marketed to kids, but that will be a tough row to hoe-

[steve86]

“the harm is coming from just certain products like THC- not flavored juices”

Please share your evidence that THC is responsible for this. Lol, you can’t. If you could Juul would pay you $10 million dollars for it.

[ml/nj]

governments can’t just ban things when there is no evidence it is causing harm

These days it's stroke of the pen, law of the land.

ML/NJ