Who?
Ha haaaaa! These are the peeps you are trying to appease, Meghan.
“McCain, an NRA member”
If she visits San Francisco, will they arrest her for being a member of a “terrorist organization”?
The only ones giving anyone permission to commit violence are liberal mayors allowing antifags to attack peaceful protesters with no consequences.
IRISH BOB ALERT: this thread definitely needs the "Flailing Irish Bob....the beta male" GIFs.
I’ll say this about the late POS John McCain. He co-produced a fine daughter.
Beto really needs to lay off the booze..oh and not drive..and he has the nerve to go after guns, how many people could Beto have killed driving drunk
Robert is so dumb he thinks we shiv a git what the SS McCain thinks.
Irish Bob is not real bright .
Trump hater Megan has a bigger audience than a
rich privileged phony Mexican .
“If you do this, then this will happen,” O’Rourke said, “almost as though that’s a natural response or maybe even something that should happen or deserves to happen.”
https://webmail.lerctr.org/~transit/healy/nerd.wav
Puto O’Rourke is such a retard.
Him and the Faggot from South Bend are insufferable.
Then there us Heels-up Harris, the Fake Injun, the miserable commie and T-bone Booker and the rest of the no-names who are simply insane.
Only, leftist antifa thugs are allowed violence.
Reading the article, I’m glad Ms. McCain stood up for the 2nd Amendment, but I’d put it more strongly. I’m not really even a gun “enthusiast”, but I most certainly DO understand what the 2A is about, and as a good citizen, if anyone tries to confiscate my guns, and (most of) my neighbors’ guns, it is not a matter of “may”, the grabbers WILL have a modern day Lexington and Concord on their hands.
Or, perhaps Ms. McCain should ask Beto onto the show, ask him if he intends to confiscate her “assault rifle” (I’ve not checked to see if she’s said she has one, but I bet she does, or can, simply to make the point) and then quote a little Patrick Henry to him.
Do you intend to kill me, Beto?
However, a more persuasive argument, and less radical, in a fashion, would be to simply point out that while not part of the text, the 2A essentially says that in the US, the government shall and does trust the people. Trust, of course, goes both ways. If a gov’t restricts the 2A, it is essentially saying it does not trust the people. Mistrust also generally runs both ways...