” Supreme Court having developed “a jurisprudence of one person, one vote,”
Actually the Supreme Court developed a “jurisprudence of one man, one vote” but no one uses that phase anymore. So yes, SCOTUS somewhere found a legal principal that had eluded everyone who had gone before and altered all of the state senates (which were modeled on the US Senate). Which begs the question, how can the US Senate be Constitutional?
Progressives have been chewing on this for a while, but alas, the composition of the Senate is off limits to both the Supreme Court “jurisprudence” and even amendment.
Those pesky Founding Fathers. They seem to get in the way of all good ideas.
The MSNBC host based his opinion off the Supreme Court having developed “a jurisprudence of one person, one vote,” which means “each individual vote has to carry roughly the same amount of weight as each other individual vote.”<>
One Man One Vote is judicially imposed garbage.
Progressing the Constiution - One Man One Vote, Part I of V.