Just like Chicago does to Wisconsin on election day.
“with zero proof”
Adopting the DEMOCRATIC WAY is he?
Just like Chicago does to Wisconsin on election day.
Actually, a couple of UNH students have already been convicted of illegal voting.
The laws here were amazingly vague, making prosecution difficult. They have been improved.
I’m sure that Kelly Ayotte would still be in the Senate, and Trump would have had 4 more EV, had it not been for organized illegal votong in 2016.
Actually voter fraud is okay if it is oriented towards Democrats, it is mandatory
There is also zero evidence that our elections are secure against the documented efforts of union thugs to commit widespread vote fraud. While I have little trust in the evil that unions have become, I know those thugs are not stupid. They work at vote fraud because they know have been successful and that they will continue to succeed. The far left media only report one side of the “zero evidence” question.
If the Boston Globe calls something a conspiracy theory, you know it is a conspiracy fact—guaranteed.
Wait until they include the name “Stacy Abrams” and the words “zero proof” in the same Paragraph.
You will be waiting until the end of time.
He sets the trap, they take the bait, he comes up with proof.
The fools will never learn he doesn't make statements he can't back up.
The Boston Globe is still in business? It was only great for the comics when I was in Maine as a teen. (Portland Press Herald was better, not much better but better.)
Here’s the proof:
https://granitegrok.com/blog/2018/05/its-still-voter-fraud-like-it-or-not
This is Durham NH results (home of UNH), just one NH college town. Look at the same day registrations below (NH allows college students to declare domicile in NH on voting day) . Keep in mind that Trump lost NH by 2736 votes.
From the town of Durham website:
A total of 9,633 votes were cast [in Durham] today {2016 general election] in town as follows:
Votes Cast
9,633
Same Day Registrations
3,121
2016 results
Hillary Clinton - 6501
Donald J. Trump - 2450
I was a democrat for years - and I know how they do voter fraud.
The reason for waiting so long on election night is they don't want to put in too many or too few extra votes. An over-vote makes it look like fraud and could cause an investigation. (It's also why the places where boxes are held back ARE the races that are closest) If you know the pattern it's easy to spot.
Does Victoria McGrane look like a liberal scold, or what?
Democrats hold back ballot boxes on election night (ever wonder why some ballot boxes take 5 hours to count after the polls are closed?) then democrat poll workers 'vote the people who didn't show up to votes'.
I was a democrat for years - and I know how they do voter fraud.
The reason for waiting so long on election night is they don't want to put in too many or too few extra votes. An over-vote makes it look like fraud and could cause an investigation. (It's also why the places where boxes are held back ARE the races that are closest) If you know the pattern it's easy to spot.
Headline: Democrat media still blaming trump for Russia collusion, with zero proof.
Maybe if the press showed an interest in finding the voter fraud, President Trump would have all the proof he needs.
But the enemedia isn’t interested, are they.