Posted on 08/11/2019 4:20:00 PM PDT by janetjanet998
New Yorks Medical Examiner released a statement after completing the autopsy on Jeffrey Epstein.
His determination is that Jeffrey Epsteins cause of death is pending further information at this time
Sure if we can trust that the DNA samples with which to compare them are not compromised in any way.
The government, politicians, and the bureaucracy while filled with many good people has also been proven to exhibit dishonesty and corruption. Even the good people often put their fingers in there ear and go “la,la la!” to avoid having to deal with or testify to the corruption of their peers and bosses(or “such good folks” are often not clued in but are there to form an outer honest aura for their respective agencies).
Thus a comparison sample of DNA would have to be sourced from where? A government data base. Or collected from where?...personal items collected and documented by government agents.
I think I would trust more a signature from his dead mother!
He may have mixed up his cm’s with his inches and no one caught it. 4 to 5 inches vs 4 to 5 cm’s...(who cares about hair measurements and never bothered to issue a mild correction).... unless the ME was sending out a “upside down flag” type signal hoping that someone would take a closer look at the sham report he was being forced to write!
Here’s the most amusing thing I’ve heard yet. The UNION boss for the guards says it’s not their fault, they are over worked and underpaid so let’s use this incompetence as a way to reward the loser guards.
Or was it a Buttigieg?
Let me guess: They misplaced the body?
The first USCG rescue swimmer that came upon her, left her for "obviously dead," as his protocol allowed for no other circumstance under which he could leave "her" in the water. Three minutes later a Honolulu TV station reported that a person had died in the crash aftermath.
Forty minutes later another USCG rescue swimmer came upon "her" and hoisted "her" up. On the way back to the airport, that helo's rescue team declared "her" condition to be "critail." (sic, read 'critical').
As "Fuddy's" Deputy Director held her had, he was visited by a person/diver/device that I believe held A/V equipment to communicate with the scenario planning team.
In sum, with all the James Bond equipment and divers swirling about "her" we'd have to say the crew would have been 100% incompetent to let her die. All the people at the scene were in on the Valhalla exit and Hollywood had every motivation to "get it right."
I twice interviewed one of the passengers. He had "coincidentally" written a murder mystery centered on the island of Molokai, where the Kalaupapa airport is. He dropped several pieces of misinformation in his breezy account of the crash and rescue. He's done likewise in a few media interviews and stories. He referred to our account as "Poppycock." We imagined he was referring to the classified US Navy Underwater Demolition Fransport Vehicle that became unbalanced and slapped up against the side of the airplane while supposedly no one was near the plane, so we now call that "Poppycock" in his "honor."
Murder by Clinton-connected organized crime, happens all the time......
Clinton Body Count ..... this site censored by Twitter yesterday ...(for telling the truth about the mass murderers)
Jeffrey Epsteins cellmate was transferred out the day before the billionaire sex traffickers alleged suicide, meaning there was no witness to observe it.
What a stunning coincidence.
What I am wondering is what are the odds of all these failures like the Camera, the guard, how did he get a rope?
The sheets and prison uniform on suicide watch are made of paper so the prisoner cannot hang himself.
Anyway, what are the odds of all these failures?
I hope it works out the way you say it is...
It could have taken only one person to smuggle something in to Epstein that he could kill himself with. Maybe one person could actually kill him, though it would be much harder. To smuggle him out of the jail alive would have required more people in on the conspiracy, and the more people are involved the harder it is to pull something like this off.
This has an 0bama birth certificate feel to it.
Do you have any of that weed you’re smoking for sale?
Sounds like some killer bud you got...
Rather than engaging the leftist go-to resort of personal derision, perhaps you could articulate why you might prefer to believe the "official" narrative, since the government is so uniformly honest and trustworthy, presumably.
So instead of a robbery gone bad, they crash a plane exactly where a SEAL team is waiting to kill her?
Look up Occam’s Razor...
Gibbs rule #39, there are no coincidences!
Epstein is allegedly dead from an alleged suicide!
Even Epstein was surprised that he committed suicide!
Gibbs Rule #40: If it seems someone is out to get you, they are.
Is there Russia wool in the bedding? They need to DNA a test the fibers.
And people here quick deny the Russians are involved....geez.
There was never any assertion of a robbery, except perhaps as to the question of what happened to "Fuddy's" socks, shoes, costume jewelry, bracelets, etc. The thorough Medical Examiner should have had all those if she had the unmolested "Fuddy" corpse to examine, but they are not part of any itemizations from that "autopsy."
Yes, though it's doubtful they were US Navy SEALs, there was a team of military trained divers on-site as the plane ditched.
The implication of your Occam's Razor reference is that any bad guys that would create a sufficiently unlikely scenario--as judged by what, the "average Joe" audience member?--would then be absolved of any crime because such a calculation would deem it just too convoluted, that it must be some hair-brained "conspiracy theory" by some nut-job.
Bingo! What an easy way to get away with every government staged event! Enter the Clowns In American 1967 memo that suggested the pejorative use of the "conspiracy theory" cudgel.
One has to review real evidence. One has to weigh all the many lies all the participants told to officials in this scenario. (Get the book!) Only then can one properly weigh how Occam's Razor would apply.
I suggest that when this is done, Occam's Razor will suggest that this was indeed a contrived and planned event--not an accident--which then will be the only reasonable explanation for so many participants' lies and evidence that with uncanny and great regularity contradicts the official story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.