>>Joe says: “Bottom line: you don’t know how much, if any, Origin of Life research there is, or how much of it is Federally funded. You suspect it’s a lot, I suspect it’s not so much, and my reason is precisely that direct practical applications for Origin of Life research are... limited.
I agree that there are limited (perhaps ZERO) practical applications. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that ALL of the OoL research is funded by the taxpayer.
*********************
>>Kalamata: “You have to be pretty desperate to recruit a corrupt judge and an even more corrupt legal team to suppress the opposition. Science should be able to stand on its own without the threat of a Galilean type of Inquisition to those simply questioning it.”
>>Joe says: “Says our proponent of religious rule over science.”
That would be you, Joe, and your promotion of the religion of evolutionism.
*********************
>>Joe says: “It’s worth noting that the school board which had voted to accept the Creationist textbook was voted out of office.
That means nothing, Joe. When are you going to address the fact that thugs from the evolutionism orthodoxy, and a devout communist organization called the ACLU, team up to recruit corrupt federal judges to suppress those who question your religion? I thought you were supposed to be a great defender of the constitution?
What creationist textbook?
Mr. Kalamata
And yet you provide no evidence to support such claims, instead wish to use Denier Rule #10 -- shift the burden of proof for your own claims.
Kalamata: "That would be you, Joe, and your promotion of the religion of evolutionism."
Still more of your use of Denier Rules #5, #6 & #7.
Kalamata: ">>Joe says: “It’s worth noting that the school board which had voted to accept the Creationist textbook was voted out of office.
Kalamata: "That means nothing, Joe."
Right, Denier Rule #1.
In fact, that event is all-important, because it clearly demonstrates who was trying to shove their own theology down the throats of unwilling citizens.
Clearly the citizens in "Dover" did not want and would not accept Creationists dogma imposed by the government school board.
Kalamata: "When are you going to address the fact that thugs from the evolutionism orthodoxy, and a devout communist organization called the ACLU, team up to recruit corrupt federal judges to suppress those who question your religion?
I thought you were supposed to be a great defender of the constitution?"
When is Kalamata going to recognize and accept the fact that citizen/voters in "Dover" did not want and would not accept Creationist nonsense shoved down the throats of their children?
Answer: never, of course, because that would violate Denier Rule #1, among others.