Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz Slams Tennessee Law Honoring Confederate General, KKK Grand Wizard Nathan Bedford Forest
Townhall.com ^ | July 13, 2019 | Timothy Meads

Posted on 07/13/2019 11:31:06 AM PDT by Kaslin

Mandated by law, Saturday, July 13 is "Nathan Forrest Bedford Day" Tennessee with an annual proclamation issued by the governor each year. On Friday evening, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas slammed Governor Bill Lee for signing the announcement once again. 

This is WRONG. Nathan Bedford Forrest was a Confederate general & a delegate to the 1868 Democratic Convention. He was also a slave trader & the 1st Grand Wizard of the KKK. Tennessee should not have an official day (tomorrow) honoring him. Change the law. https://t.co/XBgoRCBoI0— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) July 12, 2019

But why did he have to sign the law? Fox News has the details:

Tennessee law stipulates that the governor must declare six days to be "days of special observance" and "invite the people of this state to observe the days in schools, churches, and other suitable places with appropriate ceremonies expressive of the public sentiment befitting the anniversary of such dates."

Those days include Robert E. Lee Day, honoring the commander of the Confederate Army, on Jan. 19; Abraham Lincoln Day on Feb. 12; Andrew Jackson Day on March 15; Confederate Decoration Day, celebrating the birthday of Confederate President Jefferson Davis, on June 3; and Veterans Day on Nov. 11.

Accordingly, Democratic state Tennessee lawmakers also criticized the law and the day honoring Bedford. 

"This a reminder of the painful and hurtful of the crimes that were committed against black people," Democratic Tennessee Rep. Vincent Dixie told WTVF. "Now you're signing a proclamation honoring the same people that fought to keep people that look like me, African Americans in slavery."



TOPICS: US: Tennessee; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: billlee; bloggers; breaking; cds; cruz; cruzderangementonfr; cubanadian; fortpillowmassacre; lyinted; nathanbedfordforrest; nevercruzers; tedcruz; tennessee; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
To: Kaslin

It’s true Forrest was a slave trader and Klansman, but he was also one of the most brilliant generals of the Civil War.


21 posted on 07/13/2019 11:49:28 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So who is Ted Cruz expecting brownie points from? Certainly not Democrats. This man’s political instincts aren’t great. A Republican hitching his wagon to SJW history-erasing and iconoclastic statue destruction is really sort of peculiar, and will not gain him a thing. Conservatives are traditionalists. Cruz, well, I don’t really know what he is. Suspect he doesn’t either.


22 posted on 07/13/2019 11:49:32 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

See what happens when a ‘natural born’ Canadian holds a seat in our Congress..


23 posted on 07/13/2019 11:49:41 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2

bookmark


24 posted on 07/13/2019 11:50:29 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Cruz needs to research the origin of the KKK...


25 posted on 07/13/2019 11:51:32 AM PDT by JBW1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Cruz...You are from TEXAS. Stop sticking your nose in another states business.


26 posted on 07/13/2019 11:52:42 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Let’s just discard all historical context and label everyone “good” or “bad” based on the narrative of the day.

Forrest was a Democrat....
27 posted on 07/13/2019 11:57:04 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We need to get rid of those disgraceful American flags because the Klan once carried them.


28 posted on 07/13/2019 11:57:30 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Cruz you represent Texas not Tenn.


29 posted on 07/13/2019 11:59:12 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Forrest’s testimony before Congress.

In 1871, Gen. Forrest was called before a congressional Committee. Forrest testified before Congress personally over four hours .

Here’s part of the transcript of Forrest’s testimony to that 1871 hearing:

“The reports of Committees, House of Representatives, second session, forty-second congress,” P. 7-449.

“The primary accusation before this board is that Gen. Forrest was a founder of The Klan, and its first Grand Wizard, So it shall address those accusations first.”

Forrest took the witness stand June 27th,1871. Building a railroad in Tennessee at the time, Gen Forrest stated he ‘had done more , probably than any other man, to suppress these violence and difficulties and keep them down, had been vilified and abused in the (news) papers, and accused of things I never did while in the army and since. He had nothing to hide, wanted to see this matter settled, our country quiet once more, and our people united and working together harmoniously.’

Asked if he knew of any men or combination of men violating the law or preventing the execution of the law: Gen Forest answered emphatically, ‘No.’ (A Committee member brought up a ‘document’ suggesting otherwise, the 1868 newspaper article from the “Cincinnati Commercial”. That was their “evidence”, a news article.)

Forrest stated ‘...any information he had on the Klan was information given to him by others.’

Sen. Scott asked, ‘Did you take any steps in organizing an association or society under that prescript (Klan constitution)?’

Forrest: ‘I DID NOT’ Forrest further stated that ‘..he thought the Organization (Klan) started in middle Tennessee, although he did not know where. It is said I started it.’

Asked by Sen. Scott, ‘Did you start it, Is that true?’

Forrest: ‘No Sir, it is not.’

Asked if he had heard of the Knights of the white Camellia, a Klan-like organization in Louisiana,

Forrest: ‘Yes, they were reported to be there.’

Senator: ‘Were you a member of the order of the white Camellia?’

Forrest: ‘No Sir, I never was a member of the Knights of the white Camellia.’

Asked about the Klan :

Forrest: ‘It was a matter I knew very little about. All my efforts were addressed to stop it, disband it, and prevent it....I was trying to keep it down as much as possible.’

Forrest: ‘I talked with different people that I believed were connected to it, and urged the disbandment of it, that it should be broken up.’”

The following article appeared in the New York times June 27th, “Washington, 1871. Gen Forrest was before the Klu Klux Committee today, and his examination lasted four hours. After the examination, he remarked than the committee treated him with much courtesy and respect.”


Then we have Fort Pillow.

Fort Pillow

More than fifty Union soldiers that were present at this battle who gave sworn testimonies contradicting these findings first presented in the press.

LT Van Horn’s report makes no mention of any “massacre” or misconduct on the part of Forrest or his men and was for a time a prisoner himself, reporting “I escaped by putting on citizen’s clothes, after I had been some time their prisoner. I received a slight wound of the left ear”

LT Van Horn reported that “Lieutenant John D. Hill, Sixth U. S. Heavy Artillery, was ordered outside the fort to burn some barracks, which he, with the assistance of a citizen who accompanied him, succeeded in effecting.” This accounts for the barracks allegedly burned by Confederates in which wounded Union soldiers were supposed to have perished.

Union officers were in charge of burials and made no such report of living burials.

The report of Lieutenant Daniel Van Horn, Sixth U. S. Colored Heavy Artillery confirmed this in which he reported: “There never was a surrender of the fort, both officers and men declaring they never would surrender or ask for quarter.”

“Some of our men were killed by both whites and Negroes who had once surrendered”

Numbers 16. Report of Lieutenant Daniel Van Horn, Sixth U. S. Colored Heavy Artillery, of the capture of Fort Pillow - Federal Official Records, Series I, Vol. 32, Part 1, pp. 569-570

HDQRS. SIXTH U. S. HEAVY ARTILLERY (COLORADO,

Fort Pickering, Memphis, Tenn., April 14, 1864.

COLONEL: I have the honor to submit the following report of the battle and capture of Fort Pillow, Tenn.: At sunrise on the morning of the 12th of April, 1864, our pickets were attacked and driven in, they making very slight resistance. They were from the Thirteenth Tennessee Cavalry

Major Booth, commanding the post, had made all his arrangements for battle that the limited force under his command would allow, and which was only 450 effective men, consisting of the First Battalion of the Sixth U. S. Heavy Artillery, five companies of the Thirteenth Tennessee Cavalry, and one section of the Second U. S. Light Artillery (Colorado, Lieutenant Hunter.

Arrangements were scarcely completed and the men placed in the rifle-pits before the enemy came upon us and in ten times our number, as acknowledged by General Chalmers. They were repulsed with heavy loss; charged again and were again repulsed. At the third chargee Major Booth was killed, while passing among his men and cheering them to fight. The order was then given to retire inside the fort, and General Forrest sent in a flag of truce demanding an unconditional surrender of the fort, which was returned with a decided refusal.

During the time consumed by this consultation advantage was taken by the enemy to place in position his force, they crawling up to the fort. After the flag had retired, the fight was renewed and raged with fury for some time, when another flag of truce was sent in and another demand for surrender made, they assuring us at the same time that they would treat us as “prisoners of war.”

Another refusal was returned, when they again charged the works and succeeded in carrying them. Shortly before this, however, Lieutenant John D. Hill, Sixth U. S. Heavy Artillery, was ordered outside the fort to burn some barracks, which he, with the assistance of a citizen who accompanied him, succeeded in effecting, and in returning was killed. Major Bradford, of the Thirteenth Tennessee Cavalry, was now in command. At 4 o’clock the fort was in possession of the enemy, every man having been either killed, wounded, or captured.

There never was a surrender of the fort, both officers and men declaring they never would surrender or ask for quarter. [emphasis added, ed.] As for myself, I escaped by putting on citizen’s clothes, after I had been some time their prisoner. I received a slight wound of the left ear. I cannot close this report without adding my testimony to that accorded by others wherever the black man has been brought into battle. Never did men fight better, and when the odds against us are considered it is truly miraculous that we should have held the fort an hour. To the colored troops is due the successful holding out until 4 p. m. The men were constantly at their posts, and in fact through the whole engagement showed a valor not, under the circumstances, to have been expected from troops less than veterans, either white or black.

The following is a list of the casualties among the officers as far as known: Killed, Major Lionel F. Booth, Sixth U. S. Heavy Artillery (colored); Major William F. Bradford, Thirteenth Tennessee Cavalry; Captain Theodore F. Bradford, Thirteenth Tennessee Cavalry; Captain Delos Carson, Company D, Sixth U. S. Heavy Artillery (colored); Lieutenant John D. Hill, Company C, Sixth U. S. Heavy Artillery (colored); Lieutenant Peter Bischoff,* Company A, Sixth U. S. Heavy Artillery (colored). Wounded, Captain Charles J. Epeneter, Company A, prisoner; Lieutenant Thomas W. McClure, Company C, prisoner; Lieutenant Henry Lippettt, Company B, escaped, badly wounded; Lieutenant Van Horn, Company D, escaped, slightly wounded.

I know of about 15 men of the Sixth U. S. Heavy Artillery (colored) having escaped, and all but 2 of them are wounded.

I have the honor to be, very respectfully, &c.,

DANIEL VAN HORN,

2nd Lieutenant Company D, Sixth U. S. Heavy Artillery (colored).

Lieutenant Colonel T. H. HARRIS,

Assistant Adjutant-General

Source Library of Congress; Congressional Investigation held by John Sherman.


30 posted on 07/13/2019 11:59:45 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Wow, Ted pulls a Beto !


31 posted on 07/13/2019 11:59:56 AM PDT by csvset (illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Et tu, Brute?


32 posted on 07/13/2019 12:00:06 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Capitalism produces EVERYTHING Socialists/Communists/Democratic-Socialists wish to "redistribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: stanne
When he surprises everyone with a defense of Trump he’ll be relevant. Until then forget this guy

Cruz is a spineless coward precisely because he has supported Trump at times.

Trump insulted Cruz's wife's looks and mocked her mental health issues, and he mocked Cruz's dad.

I didn't like Cruz before 2016 - I was never impressed with him during the times that I was around and met with he and his staff, but after watching Trump completely trash his family publicly, I lost all remaining respect for Cruz, because Cruz ultimately bowed and kissed Trump's ring.
33 posted on 07/13/2019 12:00:39 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ted is obviously not interested in another White House run. Because he has just lost the South. And he’s found yet another way to make it more difficult to get re-elected.


34 posted on 07/13/2019 12:01:05 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

This is surely the truth. Our Reps/Senators do not stay within the coloring lines anymore. And I, for one, am sick of it. Cruz has no business discussing TN’s business. He’s a jerk and he’s always been a jerk.


35 posted on 07/13/2019 12:01:24 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Forrest’s position on race relations:

The Independent Order of Pole-Bearers Association (predecessor to the NAACP) was organized by Southern blacks after the war to promote black voting rights, etc. One of their early conventions was held in Memphis and Mr. Forrest was invited to be the guest speaker, the first white man ever to be invited to speak to the Association.

After the Civil War, General Forrest made a speech to the Memphis City Council (then called the Board of Aldermen). In this speech he said that there was no reason that the black man could not be doctors, store clerks, bankers, or any other job equal to whites. They were part of our community and should be involved and employed as such just like anyone else. In another speech to Federal authorities, Forrest said that many of the ex-slaves were skilled artisans and needed to be employed and that those skills needed to be taught to the younger workers. If not, then the next generation of blacks would have no skills and could not succeed and would become dependent on the welfare of society.

When Forrest died in 1877 it is noteworthy that his funeral in Memphis was attended not only by a throng of thousands of whites but by hundreds of blacks as well. The funeral procession was over two miles long and was attended by over 10,000 area residents, including 3000 black citizens paying their respects.

Forrest’s speech to the Independent Order of Pole-Bearers Association July 5, 1875.

A convention and BBQ was held by the Independent Order of Pole-Bearers Association at the fairgrounds of Memphis, five miles east of the city. An invitation to speak was conveyed to General Nathan Bedford Forrest, one of the city’s most prominent citizens, and one of the foremost cavalry commanders in the late War Between the States. This was the first invitation granted to a white man to speak at this gathering. The invitation’s purpose, one of the leaders said, was to extend peace, joy, and union, and following a brief welcoming address a Miss Lou Lewis, daughter of an officer of the Pole-Bearers, brought forward flowers and assurances that she conveyed them as a token of good will. After Miss Lewis handed him the flowers, General Forrest responded with a short speech that, in the contemporary pages of the Memphis Appeal, evinces Forrest’s racial open-mindedness that seemed to have been growing in him.

Ladies and Gentlemen I accept the flowers as a memento of reconciliation between the white and colored races of the southern states. I accept it more particularly as it comes from a colored lady, for if there is any one on God’s earth who loves the ladies I believe it is myself. ( Immense applause and laughter.) I came here with the jeers of some white people, who think that I am doing wrong. I believe I can exert some influence, and do much to assist the people in strengthening fraternal relations, and shall do all in my power to elevate every man to depress none. (Applause.) I want to elevate you to take positions in law offices, in stores, on farms, and wherever you are capable of going. I have not said anything about politics today. I don’t propose to say anything about politics. You have a right to elect whom you please; vote for the man you think best, and I think, when that is done, you and I are freemen. Do as you consider right and honest in electing men for office. I did not come here to make you a long speech, although invited to do so by you. I am not much of a speaker, and my business prevented me from preparing myself. I came to meet you as friends, and welcome you to the white people. I want you to come nearer to us. When I can serve you I will do so. We have but one flag, one country; let us stand together. We may differ in color, but not in sentiment Many things have been said about me which are wrong, and which white and black persons here, who stood by me through the war, can contradict. Go to work, be industrious, live honestly and act truly, and when you are oppressed I’ll come to your relief. I thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for this opportunity you have afforded me to be with you, and to assure you that I am with you in heart and in hand. (Prolonged applause.)

Whereupon N. B. Forrest again thanked Miss Lewis for the bouquet and then gave her a kiss on the cheek. Such a kiss was unheard of in the society of those days, in 1875, but it showed a token of respect and friendship between the general and the black community and did much to promote harmony among the citizens of Memphis.

This is yet another prime example.....admit it....how many of you have ever heard of any of this? Feel free to look it up. Its all documented and accurate. Its just that it runs directly contrary to the PC Revisionist narrative so it will not be taught in the government schools. The so-called “history” channel and PBS will never air any program showing the above. Yet its all true.....


36 posted on 07/13/2019 12:05:13 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess Beto O’Rourk really scared him in the last election!


37 posted on 07/13/2019 12:06:09 PM PDT by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Candidate Trump was defending his wife when the Canadian/Cuban Cruz attempted to besmirch Meliana in the unholy state of Utah. Candidate Trump counter the snake from Canada .. when one needs to twist what happened, their credibility become zero.
38 posted on 07/13/2019 12:06:31 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Bookmark.


39 posted on 07/13/2019 12:06:49 PM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Better to think of the post-war guerrilla resistance as a completely different group than the unconnected organization which is glamorized in “Birth of a Nation.”


40 posted on 07/13/2019 12:06:56 PM PDT by BDParrish (One representative for every 30,000 persons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson