Posted on 07/10/2019 12:11:59 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Candidates from large states enjoy a big advantage in presidential elections, and Sen. Kamala Harris is the only major candidate from Americas largest, wealthiest state. Yet she is running in a disappointing fourth-place in California polls. Why?
Its not a good time to be a law-and-order Democrat in California. There is a backlash against mass incarceration and the policies that led to it a sentiment which imperils Harris campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
*** Yes I agree, polls are witch doctor voodoo. A new UC Berkeley-Los Angeles Times poll found Biden leading with 22% of likely Democratic primary voters; followed by Warren and Sanders, who are at 18% and 17%, respectively. Harris (13%)
That poll is Cal. only
she’s ineligible anyway and she knows it (or else she wouldn’t have hidden the info about it from her website, bio)
She better buy more Knee pads ,LOL
That might convince the superdelegates. The author didn’t take that into account. If she trails Biden by 9% in Cal, how many “favors” would it take to catch up?
As Ive noted here before, my dispatch behind enemy line: its not as if shes a beloved former governor or scion of some political family, or even just known for being a nice person. Among the rat drones she doesnt have any particular cachet on account of being from here. Most might be able to name the Governor, but the other constitutional officers like Attorney General just arent on their dim radar screens. Shes done nothing to get any favorite daughter boost. I really think its as simple as that
law-and-order Democrat in California
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That’s more rare than a unicorn.
Glenn Sacks teaches at James Monroe High School in the Los Angeles Unified School District.
But who know harris was a law and order candidate?
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.
And your point is?
So it is a commentary.
And your point is?
As Bill Clinton would say, it depends upon what the meaning of "law and order" is. Kamala was not going to crack down on Planned Parenthood, even if Cal. had such a law.
So she was responsible for breaking up families in California.
That’s why I posted it under “editorial.” The article contains some hard facts, like incarceration numbers. But the Daily Caller displays OPINION right at the top of the article, which refers to the its main claim, which is that Cal. Dems are a major problem for Kamala.
Kamala isn’t eligible to be President or any job that can succeed President.
IMO, she is committing election FRAUD by taking as much as a single dollar to run for a position she CAN NOT hold.
so what is your point?
Her biggest impediment can be summed up in two words: blow jobs. Right Willie?
Different rules this time. Superdelegates don’t vote on the first ballot this time (or rather, they only vote on the first ballot if one candidate has a majority of pledged delegates). The result is that they only matter if no candidate has a majority of delegates.
Californians know she used her vagina to get ahead.
So what’s worse, claiming a false heritage, or being a whore?
That I posted it in the most appropriate sidebar I could find. Some of your posts emphasized the fact that this article is mostly an opinion piece. I am aware of that. "Opinion" is a synonym of "editorial."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.