SCOTUS better get back into session and rule on this.
This is an emergency,
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Innovative
Forget the law. Put these judges on a one way boat trip.
To: Innovative
Money for national defense can’t be used for national defense.
Got it.
3 posted on
07/03/2019 7:07:52 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: Innovative
How the hell does ANY court claim jurisdiction over the budget directed to defend sovereign borders?
Trump needs to call the Ninth out on this, build the damn wall, and to hell with those black-robed tyrants.
4 posted on
07/03/2019 7:08:22 PM PDT by
Ciaphas Cain
(Polls don't lie, but liars poll.)
To: Innovative
EFF these black robbed POS. BUILD THE DAMN WALL!
5 posted on
07/03/2019 7:08:59 PM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: Innovative
6 posted on
07/03/2019 7:09:05 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Capitalism produces EVERYTHING Socialists/Communists/Democratic-Socialists wish to "redistribute.")
To: Innovative
9th Circus needs to be disbanded ASAP and replaced with an honest court
7 posted on
07/03/2019 7:09:06 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: Innovative
Keep building while (if) an appeal happens. Otherwise do like the libocrats. Court? 😂😂😂
9 posted on
07/03/2019 7:12:30 PM PDT by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Innovative
Will the SC even take the case?
To: Innovative
We don’t need SCOUTS or anyone else to allow the government what the Constitution MANDATES they do: PREVENT INVASION!!! (U.S. Constitution, Art IV, Sec 4). (Illegal immigration and immigration of our enemies is invasion.)
Unconstitutional court decisions should be ignored and nullified and Trump should show his constitutional right to move forward and MOVE FORWARD with the wall regardless of unconstitutional judicial decisions!
The Constitution trumps the courts and the Constitution, NOT the courts, is the Supreme Law of the Land (Art. VI, Cl. 2).
11 posted on
07/03/2019 7:13:36 PM PDT by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: Innovative
Our court system is out of control.
12 posted on
07/03/2019 7:13:47 PM PDT by
McGruff
To: Innovative
America’s robed mullahs instrumental in the destruction of the republic.
13 posted on
07/03/2019 7:14:38 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: Innovative
Deep State is ready to go to the mat. Trump’s border actions are having an effect. SCOTUS will rule against Trump, COUNT ON IT. Chief Traitor Roberts will side with the Ruth Android Ginsburg and crew.
14 posted on
07/03/2019 7:15:07 PM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(Enjoy the decline of the American empire.)
To: Innovative
New Mexico is in the 10th Circuit. Thats out of the jurisdiction of the 9th circus.
15 posted on
07/03/2019 7:17:18 PM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
To: Innovative
The Commander in Chief has declared a national emergency.
A court of appeals overrides his authority.
To let this stand would set a precedent denying a president to execute his sworn duty.
To allow this to stand would mean the courts would decide what is a national emergency and what is not.
17 posted on
07/03/2019 7:18:41 PM PDT by
Hostage
(Article V)
To: Innovative
The president has the power to respond to emergencies under the Emergency Decl act of 1974. The congress has the right to over rule the declaration. They tried and failed.
There is no role for the judiciary in emergency declarations. You can’t provide for the national defense of 200 federal judges can individually or in small panels overrule the president who its commander-in-chief.
The president should stop responding to the court and make a statement, but starting with the immigration restrictions from terrorist counties he had deferred to the courts on matters of national security.
What will he do when the USSC votes 5-4 to not fund the wall?
19 posted on
07/03/2019 7:21:07 PM PDT by
morphing libertarian
( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: Innovative
some judge will ask, if it was an emergency during your campaign and in Jan 2017, why did you let it go so long?
20 posted on
07/03/2019 7:24:11 PM PDT by
morphing libertarian
( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: Innovative
21 posted on
07/03/2019 7:24:31 PM PDT by
jimfree
(My18 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
To: Innovative
To: Innovative
I guess we’ll find out next June if the wall can be built.
23 posted on
07/03/2019 7:27:30 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(This Space For Rant)
To: Innovative
24 posted on
07/03/2019 7:31:25 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(This Space For Rant)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson