Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maudeen
Abortion bans do, indeed, ban abortion.

Growing up in the late ‘50s early ‘60s before the pill and legal abortions was a totally different moral environment. Having sex before marriage was a very high pressure event. Most kids didn’t and those that did were playing a form of Russian Roulette. But, the teenage birth rate was a fraction of what it is today. The proportion of single parent families was minuscule. Public high school day care centers were nonexistent. Mandated welfare costs were a much smaller line item of municipal and state budgets. It was a different world in many ways.

5 posted on 06/17/2019 10:33:46 AM PDT by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: immadashell

I agree with the sentiment behind your post, but as far as teen birth rates go, those are actually lower today than in 1960. Not because of anything good, of course.


10 posted on 06/17/2019 11:35:07 AM PDT by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: immadashell

You nailed it.

The more we encourage “birth control” thru artificial contraceptives, the more we facilitate promiscuity, which in turn results in more, not fewer, unwanted pregnancies.

I’m old enough to remember when the Catholic Church adamantly campaigned against the Pill, saying it would lead to millions of abortions.

The left at that time howled in derision.
Ridiculous, they said. Women wouldn’t NEED abortions if they got on the Pill!

And here we are.


14 posted on 06/17/2019 3:51:32 PM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the Future, brother. It is murder.. --L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson