As you know, or should know, the Wikipedia excerpts are *footnoted*, one of the more important ones to the transcript of a White House press conference statement.
Did you check the transcript?
Why did the wiki ‘authority’ use the qualifier ‘apparently’? I’ll tell you why. They used it to insinuate their own bias into the narrative. You either know or you don’t know.
There are too many self-promoting aholes in the political joker field who take circumstances and incomplete facts and twist them to their own ends in a bid to boost their delusional self-importance.
Whenever I see such ‘reporting’ I say in my mind “get the eff out!”
A further example is this idiot wiki writer followed the “apparently” canard with a little dig that Gen. Flynn did not report the transaction. First of all, idiot doesn’t know if Gen. Flynn got permission or not, and if he did get permission, there is no need for a report except on taxes which are private.
So I see red flag BS all over this joker’s stinkpile
It looks and smells like garbage. You promulgated it. Shame on you.