[Fred Nerks]

I’m under the impression no one can conduct a forensic examination of any document unless they have to hand an actual, real-time document to examine. Any so called birth record under discussion here has never been physically handled. All that has ever been seen is a representation shown on your computer screen.

What value then, such an ‘analysis’?

[Candor7]

What value then, such an ‘analysis’?>>>

Yes, its definitely a moving target. So the original fraudulent document is replaceable with yet another and so on.

[Jack Black]

A computer file was what we were provided. Yes, you can do forensics on computer files. It may be insufficient to demonstrate, in the case of a facsimile or photo, that it is an accurate version of the original. Or, it might show (for instance in pixel-peaking) obvious signs of manipulation. Plus there is a varying amount of meta-data in most pictures.

So I would say "it's different" not that it's a useless analysis.

If you take a photo off of the web and put it in Windows Media you can often learn a lot about the picture, if the "properties" fields have not been erased, including the name of the person who took it.

[itsahoot]

What value then, such an ‘analysis’?

Why don't you review some of the proofs that the BC is a fraud and then decide the value. It is an unequivocal fraudulently produced document. Inform yourself.