Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brownsfan

Technically, that’s what the decoys they carry are supposed to do. They were *also* supposed to be carrying anti-torpedo torpedoes but that program was abruptly cancelled a couple months ago.


11 posted on 05/31/2019 8:48:01 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

If a US order brings the cost per unit down due to the obvious economy of scale it might even pursuade our parsimonious MoD to order more than 8 of them. They’re already talking about raising the defence budget beyond the NATO minimum so this would be a great way of stimulating the growth of the Royal Navy back to a sustainable level.


14 posted on 05/31/2019 9:02:29 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr

“Technically, that’s what the decoys they carry are supposed to do.”

I’m old school enlisted, rode a cruiser and a destroyer. When push comes to shove, all ships in the battle group are torpedo catchers if it means saving a carrier. But I’m absolutely sure that’s not the intended purpose for any modern vessel.


15 posted on 05/31/2019 9:03:46 AM PDT by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson