So "Californiated" ARs are okay?
Republicans need to pass federal legislation that it is illegal to target business that you don’t like and exclude your product from those companies, like this idiot software company. and like banks who did the same thing with gun retailers
These retailers, selling guns, are engaging in a legal business and these suppliers should not have a right to withhold their services. Even the cake baker did not attempt to withhold his services of baking a cake, he refused to make an endorsement of gay marriage on the cake. Okay banks and software companies, suppliers, do not need to endorse the gun retailer but should be compelled to provide the service.
Is it a requirement that people living and working in San Francisco have a mandatory Stupid Pill prescription?
So "Californiated" ARs are okay?
Delay new installs and mods. Big cash flow item ans someone at the top will be screaming.
They should just start selling only AR-10’s. Better caliber anyway. ;-)
They should just start selling only AR-10’s. Better caliber anyway. ;-)
Best thing to do is get an injunction with intent to go to civil trial with Salesforce.
You can’t win the trial, they’ve got you on the customer agreement. What you can do is cost them a ton of money in legal fees and buy time to switch to a competing product.
The chart I pulled up on sales force seemed not very impressive. Not sure if this a significant player or not.
I don’t think this was a purposeful outcome, but it is now an obvious vulnerability of the subscription model of software. Companies pay to lease and customize software they no longer own. The software companies are geographically concentrated in an area politically monolithic, activist and intolerant of dissenting viewpoints. those software companies will be filled with people look to leverage their products as tools of activism.
Time to tell Salesforce to go to hell and find a conservative software company who will do business with them.
Also, might be grounds for a lawsuit re “fraud” in that Salesforce sold them goods and services under false pretenses. They changed the rules in the middle of a contract, and that is illegal and actionable.
Time to sue the balls off these leftist pricks and nail them to the courthouse wall.
Applying this logic, if I run a software company I can prohibit its use if your company performs abortions.
Arms manufacturers should retaliate and prohibit purchase of any of their weapons by security personnel of any company who uses sales force software.
So many better and less expensive programs out there now other than salesforce.com. Salesforce is useless and full on bs.
I use Salesforce and some of the others. There are others that are far more useful and easier to use.
Whatta bout AR-10s?
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act
As I was trying to say when my phone obliterated half of what I typed:
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, this is an end run on that law.
How big a deal is this?
How many retailers who sell AR 15s use Salesforce?
What percent of the total is that?
This is a real problem. But can’t be addressed via normal boycott.
Probably lots of Freepers use Salesforce in some capacity as part of their job - and may not even realize it. But likely zero or less of us have any say about it. The vast, vast majority of SF users did not buy Salesforce. Insulated and politically correct execs at large corporations did.
Now you know what Trump feels like. You are up against the free market’s quickly deepening swamp.
Salesforce is a powerful tool for sending all of your and your customers’ data to China (and a few other countries and non-state actors as well).
One can only hope that with Salesforce getting “woke” about firearms, that the democrat party goes all in on Salesforce CRM at the federal, state, and local levels.
Suppose a private company owned the power grid that Salesforce’s headquarters used. Should they be allowed to refuse Salesforce any electric power unless Salesforce stopped licensing their software to abortion clinics?