Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ISRAELI NAVY INAUGURATES FIRST SAAR 6 CORVETTE
The Jerusalem Post ^ | March 24, 2019 | ANNA AHRONHEIM

Posted on 05/24/2019 6:12:33 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: sparklite2

50 kts seems way incorrect


21 posted on 05/24/2019 10:09:23 PM PDT by A strike (Import third world become third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A strike

“light: Norwegian corvettes have up to 60


22 posted on 05/24/2019 10:15:39 PM PDT by leopud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
The missile cruiser USS Long Beach was kept around home because she couldn’t keep up with the other ships.

You might be thinking of another ship? USS Long Beach had the same max speed as most other USA surface combatants, 30+ kts. She completed 15 WestPac deployments and deployed multiple times during Viet Nam and Gulf War 1.

23 posted on 05/24/2019 11:02:36 PM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Carriers turn into the wind to launch aircraft, but if there is little head wind they require the speed to help the aircraft get lift and fly away.


24 posted on 05/25/2019 3:36:35 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Long Beach was nuclear powered, wasn’t it ?


25 posted on 05/25/2019 4:45:57 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Penance for the holocaust.


26 posted on 05/25/2019 7:09:58 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Islam---At war with Western Civilization for 1400 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Yes. the first nuclear powered surface warship in the world


27 posted on 05/25/2019 7:27:57 AM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ETCM
The source I had for this has been 'updated' so most of the following is gone. Maybe it turned out to be a crock, I don't know. Seems legit, but maybe it isn't. I'll let you decide.

https://uglyships.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/uss-long-beach/



USS Long Beach  CGN-9
If you wanted to serve on a ship that rarely left port in the US, the Long Beach was where to be. We couldn’t do much more than 30 knots with a clean hull, so we couldn’t keep up with the carriers, so we rarely left port. The reason was that the Long Beach was originally going to be a DLG weighing 12,000 tons. By the time the USN was done expanding it, it weighed 14,000 tons. During sea trials, it was feared that the ship would roll over because it was so top heavy, so 2000 tons of lead was added along the keel to raise the weight to 16,000 tons.

In the mid 1960’s, the 2000 tons of lead in the keel shifted so the ship didn’t roll symmetrically, and jerked 2 or three times each way rather than rolling smoothly and then snapped upright. Additionally, one of the shafts was out of balance so it vibrated a lot when it was over 20 knots. The top heaviness also caused it to roll up to 35 degrees to each side which made the steam generator sloshing from side to side real interesting and left foot prints 6 feet up the walls at the ends of the athwart ship passage ways where a sailor was forced to stop himself during a roll. In heavy seas, the nose would dive, and water would come up thru the bull nose and cover the forward Tarrier launchers. What a ride!
28 posted on 05/25/2019 7:45:43 AM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: A strike

I had heard 50, but it may be incorrect. Sea trials got to over 40 so maybe someone rounded up.


29 posted on 05/25/2019 7:49:14 AM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

The direct attacks on Iran will be by the IAF and the Saudi air force with the UAE flying cover.

The US Navy will protect the gulf from over flying Iranian missiles and aircraft


30 posted on 05/25/2019 7:52:11 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bert

Let us not forget Iran has several DE submarines. And I’ll bet they are lurking around US capital ships and the Straits.


31 posted on 05/25/2019 8:03:47 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

You are correct.

I’ll bet the precise location of each of those submarines is known and tracked


32 posted on 05/25/2019 8:04:51 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bert

I like that.


33 posted on 05/25/2019 8:05:52 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bert
I’ll bet the precise location of each of those submarines is known and tracked

I hope you are correct. Have my doubts though. DE subs can be extremely difficult to find and there have been allied DE subs penetrating our carrier nets during war games.
Surfacing very close to the carrier.

34 posted on 05/25/2019 8:14:42 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Most of that is just embellished, but the “not leaving port because we couldn’t keep up with the carriers” is just false and shows the author doesn’t know much about the USN. All of our major surface combatants, including Arleigh Burke destroyers and Ticonderoga cruisers, top out at 30-35 kts. It’s also pretty rare for carriers to go faster than that outside of sea trials. Additionally, the ship’s deployment history is well documented.


35 posted on 05/25/2019 8:57:30 AM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Carrying an F-35 is one thing. Having the thing melt your flight deck is a major bummer though.


36 posted on 05/27/2019 6:17:54 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d*mned! The narrative of the day must be preserved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: leopud

Diesel? Corvette’s typically are coastal ships that don’t require fleet speeds. Nice hull though. Put a gas tubine in that puppy and it would probably go 30 knots. It’s probably an option.


37 posted on 05/27/2019 6:19:47 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d*mned! The narrative of the day must be preserved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

AIP subs (Air Independent Propulsion) are the poor-man’s nuke boat. I think that’s what you are referring to.

DE’s are older still (technologically) and rely on snorkeling so charge batteries and ventilate just as the late-War U-boats did. When a DE “snorts” every sub in the area hears it, and they have to do it regularly.

Neither sub has the U/W speed or endurance to keep up with a carrier group though ambushes are possible in constricted waters.


38 posted on 05/27/2019 6:27:13 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d*mned! The narrative of the day must be preserved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Yes AIP. They concern me.


39 posted on 05/28/2019 2:49:38 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson