[NKP_Vet]

Both movies were a success considering they were basically blacklisted on the major news networks. Fox News did interview Dean Cain about “Gosnell” and interviewed Abby Johnson and the young lady who played her in “Unplanned.” All the interviews came on Fox and Friends so you had to be an early riser to see them. Absolute ZERO mention on the liberal networks. Maybe soon the American Holocaust called Roe v. Wade will be sent right back to back to the states, were it belongs.

[Secret Agent Man]

The “media” is gynocentric, so of course its gonna be unhappy.

[polymuser]

Every action has an opposite and equal reaction.

Proggies understand this, not. I believe there are many reactions forming, around the globe.

[JudyinCanada]

I think the dear governor explaining how born babies can be snuffed out at the mother’s desire helped the cause as well.

[Oscar in Batangas]

Let’s take the ‘win’ and be happy with our pro-life progress.

Hey, pro-death side, take your loss and get used to it...there’s more coming, I believe

[DiogenesLamp]

Gosnell’ and ‘Unplanned’ Have Changed The National Climate on Abortion…And The Media Is NOT Happy

If our side controlled the national airwaves, abortion people would be fleeing for their lives.

[stinkerpot65]

The Democrat craves a mutilated baby.

[preacher]

L8r

[loveliberty2]

What "devout" Catholic can deny the simple logic of Mother Teresa, who, at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, DC on February 3, 1994, stated: And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?"

Mother Teresa's declaration may be the most powerful statement in 2016 from which to begin discussions of murder, ambushes, and terrorists among us.

In America, our constitutional protections rest on the Founders' premise that each and all individuals are "endowed by their Creator" with the unalienable right to both life and the liberty to enjoy it, or, in their words, "the pursuit of happiness."

The sole reason these rights were deemed unalienable is that both are derived from the Creator--not from the mother or father, and not from government or judicial decision. What is "granted" by human decision also can, by implication, be withheld.

"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them (life and liberty)," said Thomas Jefferson.

"The world is different now. . . and yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forefathers fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God." - John F. Kennedy, Inaugural Address

That understanding underlies every other consideration embodied in our Declaration of Independence and every protection of our Constitution. It is the very basis of our rights to life and liberty, of laws to protect them, and it distinguishes ours from other forms of government.

When we fail to acknowledge that foundation of our liberty, then we risk liberty itself for future generations, for where does the right to choose who lives and who does not really end?

That is why the question is of vital importance in each election. Already, we have deprived millions of their Creator-endowed rights to life and liberty, and our nation must be weaker for their loss. We need leaders who understand the implications and potential consequences of departing from our founding principles.

In recent decades, technological advances have enabled us to observe the characteristics and actions of God's tiniest creations in the womb. Unlike previous generations who could not see, we have no excuse for imagining that these are mere blobs of tissue labeled "fetuses." In their early weeks, we now can see that they are living babies who will continue on to possess life and liberty if we do not "destroy" both. Indeed, they are simply smaller versions of ourselves.

Questions on the economy, taxes, threats from terrorists, health care--all are considerations at this election time. One, however, is basic to all others for me. Who will best protect the underlying premise of our Constitution--and the lives and liberties of millions yet unborn?

Promises are illusive and cheap. This voter will examine each candidate's previous voting record carefully on all issues, because past actions are the best predictors of future decisions.

[Gene Eric]

The “media” is Comcast, Disney, and now ATT.

Yes, it matters. Be a responsible consumer.

[Sarcasm Factory]

Personally, like a great many other socially conservative Americans, I'm not fanatical about abortion. For the most part, I prefer to cautiously stay out of sight and let the extremists on both sides do the yelling. But the hellish horror of Gosnell's killing chambers inevitably has induced sheer revulsion and shock in legions of formerly blasé Americans who had never thought much about this fundamentally divisive political issue. The two films mentioned desperately needed to be created and distributed. Simple truth is powerful.

Yes, the extremists on the "pro-life" side will continue to hysterically refuse to acknowledge any difference whatsoever between, say, a blobby zygote and what actually is a near-term, "unborn baby," but after decades of arrogant, heartless, creepy propaganda by the "pro-death" side and after the recent spate of truly terrifying laws and proposed laws in New York State, Virginia, and elsewhere, I have utterly nil interest in helping the pro-abortion propagandists. They wanted intolerant extremism, well, they've got intolerant extremism -- on the side of banning nearly all abortions. Ho, ho, ho, how do they like them apples?

Frankly, if Roe v. Wade is ultimately junked by a resurgent conservative bloc on the Supreme Court, I'll break out the popcorn and settle down to watch leftist heads explode like rotten cantaloupes all over the country. It'll be extremely entertaining in a grim way. :/

[TBP]

They’re progressives, so by definition they’re eugenics supporters. Therefore, any reduction n abortions undermines their racist agenda.

[Tammy8]

Another thing that has had a huge impact is the quality of the ultrasound pictures and how early they do them, depending on the doctor or health reasons. People proudly pass those ultrasound pictures around, post on social media- and it is impossible to look at them and believe you are not seeing a baby. The old “clump of cells” story just doesn’t work for anyone that isn’t already completely brainwashed.

[CAGOPgramma]

Thank you, God !!!!!!!

[Cronos]

One thing I’ve noticed arguing and convincing pro-abortionists is to not bring the religious angle into it. As a Catholic I see abortion as a high sin and great evil.

but to lead with that closes off the pro-abortionists.

So I appeal to their humanity (they try to replace God with “humanitarianism”) - and abortion fails even that basic level - if as a society we can’t protect the innocent, then what are we?