Posted on 05/20/2019 3:03:59 PM PDT by luv2ski
Edited on 05/20/2019 7:19:01 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
DENVER (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at thedenverchannel.com ...
Our poor suffer from the diseases of obesity!
So its pure BS that people go hungry here due to want.
They might go hungry because they’re on crack or other drugs but they do not go hungry for want!
Those private jets and limos aren't going to pay for themselves.
All of these democratic party candidates for president, are trying to out-stupid each other with their promises, none of which they can keep.
But, they are playing for the stupid votes, so, stupid is as stupid does.
Yeah, it’s something to keep in mind.
I’ll propose a quadrillion!
I have a set of Zimbabwean banknotes which are 10 20 50 and 100 Trillion zim dollars for a total of 180 Trillion. Im willing to donate them if these idiots would finally shut up.
Another horse’s ass heard from
Other countries are laughing their asses off as we see how to best destroy our economy - for NOTHING!
Socialism sure costs a lot.
Michael Bennet should be in prison with the rest of his co-conspirators in CONgre$$...
...his assets should be confiscated. Looting the republic of The United States of America. Relegating the citizens and future generations to debt slavery.
Hey, if he has that kind of money, more power to him.
What's that? You mean it's taxpayer money? Oh. Then it's easy to be generous.
Why not a googolplex, while we’re throwing around imaginary money?
Does he have $1 trillion? If he does then he can donate it and do all the research he wants to do. If he doesn’t he needs to STFU.
He said he wanted to commit a Trillion bucks, guess he needs to pull some 25 hour days for overtime the next millennium or so.
my cat, Frankie, who’s ALSO a Dem candidate for President strongly disagrees with Michael Bennet ...
You forgot about nuclear. It’s far cheaper than all the alternatives except hydro and is most definitely zero emission. It is especially more cost-effective than wind and solar.
In the case you didn’t know it already, 90% of France’s electricity comes from nuclear and they have the lowest overall carbon emissions of any western country.
The fact that libs won’t endorse using nuclear is proof positive that climate change is about politics and emotion and not about facts.
I didn’t know Bennet had that kind of money.
Since the article spoke of zero emissions without limiting that to carbon, I excluded nuclear because of its vast emissions of waste heat and radiation. Mining and refining the fuel, then the transporting and disposal of near-eternal radioactive waste also generate emissions. France stockpiles nuclear waste, then ships it some around the world to dump in Polynesia.
Fears of nuclear power generation are definitely driven by emotion, since fossil-fuel burning has many if the same downsides. I’d only quibble on the motives of the Left to add GREED. Some of them have positioned themselves to profit massively by brokering “credits” and other non-existence “goods” that can only be created by politics.
What’s going on with thorium-fueled pebble-bed reactors? At one point this seemed a promising technology, with much reduced danger, easier waste disposal, ability to work in smaller units, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.