1. He was first elected in 2010 as one of the original TEA Party candidates.
2. He sound like he's got solid principles in Congress, and votes accordingly.
3. Unfortunately, this means he often ends up being one of a very small number -- like, fewer than five House members -- who votes against bills that pass by huge bi-partisan margins.
4. This might make him a principled man, but also a completely useless legislator.
5. He is clearly incapable of convincing anyone else in Congress to vote his way, so his only way to deflect blame -- and generate any publicity for himself at all -- is to make these outlandish statements against President Trump ... as if it's Trump's fault that the Republicans in Congress are mostly big-government globalists.
In other words, he’s Jimmy Stewart. ;)
It hasn't escaped the notice of anyone who is involved in national politics that over the last two years, Democrat Federal judges have been making laws and conducting executive branch functions as part of a highly partisan "Resistance".
Let's use The Simple Test:
Justin Hogwash is OK with Democrats being appointed as judges to the Federal courts, because he proposes giving cover to partisan US House Democrats to impeach President Trump, thus regaining the ability to appoint Federal judges for the Democrat Party.
If you're OK with a Democrat being appointed as a judge to the Federal courts, you're a Democrat.
Justin Hogwash is a Democrat.