Respectfully, I believe you’re being incredibly naive. If you don’t see that the establishment isn’t terrified of being called “racist” or “Islamophobic” and that the police would rather crush those engaging in free speech because it’s easier than arresting those threatening violence due to their “offense”, then I suggest you look a little harder.
How would you know if they’re being “pandered to” or not? There’s cases up and down the country - including all the rape gangs where authorities ignored what they all knew was going on. Their population is doubling each decade and you think they’re “neutral” and politicians don’t notice? Come on.
The followers of Islam do not “out” each other. If someone is a “true Muslim” they believe in Sharia and are anti-individual liberty. They’re also allowed to lie to you to advance Islam. I think the dynamics of what is happening is faster than you’re realizing.
That wearisomely familiar catalogue of truths, half-truths and untruths characteristically misrepresents a subject which is far more complex than you suppose. The Rotherham saga was indeed shameful, but following its exposure - not by such as Mr Robinson, but by old-fashioned investigative reporting by, guess what, the BBC Panorama programme - subsequent official action has been very different: witness the continuing series of group prosecutions and convictions elsewhere. And few of your persuasion notice that convictions for conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism exceeds terrorist acts actually carried out by about 5 to one, or that the Muslim prison population exceeds, pro rata, the Muslim population at large by over 2 to 1.
It’s easy to conclude that a population acts or thinks in a uniform way if your information is largely media- or social media-sourced. It’s the media’s business to report aberrant behaviours, not conventional behaviour, which isn’t news. There are indeed serious problems with Islam in this country: but they’re serious problems, not the universal apocalypse which the hyperbole of those with a limited, mostly distant understanding assumes.