You are right to rebuke supporters of prostitution.
But I don’t think there are any on this thread.
Just some Freepers praising the female body, maybe coupled with some sugar-coated blindness about the degrading nastiness of that kind of massage parlor.
“You are right to rebuke supporters of prostitution. But I don’t think there are any on this thread.”
I’m not singling anyone out, but those who engage in this know if it applies to them.
If the police invaded the privacy of anyone innocent, the victims of this should be able to sue for civil damages. The police should be instructed how to avoid doing so in the future. But that should not cause the evidence to be thrown out.
I don’t think what happened here was any more invasive than the invasive security checks that happen to all commercial flight travelers every day in the U.S. Should smugglers or terrorists have their cases dismissed because of these heavy-handed law enforcement tactics?