President Trump Should Ask Democrats to Declare War on Russia

FrontPage Magazine ^ | 5/3/19 | Daniel Greenfield

[Louis Foxwell]

Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center

Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.

I am posting Greenfield's articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.

The Point is a collection of short articles posted on FrontPageMag by Greenfield on current topics. I recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.

FrontPage is a basic resource for conservative thought.

Lou

[Louis Foxwell]

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

About Daniel Greenfield

To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post or notify me by Freepmail.

Louis Foxwell

[poconopundit]

“This was an act of war, in my view,” Senator Richard Blumenthal said.

* * *

Yeah, right, Da Nang Dick. You mean like the Vietnam War you said you fought in, but never did?

[Bommer]

They would do it just to blame Trumps collusion on getting us in a nuclear war and killing millions of people. To me it’s time to demand how say 10000 voters in Pennsylvania, or Wisconsin or Michigan....and only really these states, that were going to vote for Hillary, were changed to Trump by the Russians, otherwise there is no argument, and it’s time to start rounding us and putting on trial members of Congress and the Senate with sedition. If found guilty, immediately hang them to prevent pardoning. Guarantee it would never happen again watching Maxine, Schaffer, and Nadler the Hutt swing from the gallows.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for posting this excellent article.

[Grampa Dave]

Yo, Da Nang Dick, we have just one question.

Isn’t it true that Jane Fonda spent more time in Viet Nam than you did?

[Fido969]

Wasn’t Russia involved in the phoney dossier to hurt Trump?

[Daffynition]

The dims are imitating art, with their own comedy version of the classic film

[Vaquero]

Busy. Didn’t read it. Understand the premise.

Question is do you even kid about the two most powerful nuclear nations going ‘at it’?

[redshawk]

Watching the “Dick” Go after Bar was DICK spicable.

[Socon-Econ]

Nonsense. We shouldn’t play around with declarations of war— somebody is going to take them seriously. We should be telling the Democrats to produce any hard evidence that Russia has done anything worth our getting into a dispute with them. “So-and-so in the intelligence community” said that the Russians did something is not evidence. Photos of Russian troops or missiles in Venezuela might justify our going eyeball to eyeball with them.

[NFHale]

“De Rooshians are coming.... Ev’ry body to get from street!!!”

Classic...

[Daffynition]

It was a wonderful film with a cast of such remarkable talent....here I am longing for the good-olde-daze when comedy was not a dirty word with political overtones.

[stanne]

“Question is do you even kid about the two most powerful nuclear nations going ‘at it’?”

No more than democrat congressmen should state publicly that the Russians have attacked us to the extent that we were attacked on 9/11 and Pearl Harbor. But they did state that.

[shelterguy]

Wasn’t Russia involved in the phoney dossier to hurt Trump?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Probably not. Since it was all fake, Hillary probably wrote it herself. Maybe McCain helped her with the big words.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

Hard to refute his logic.

[Grampa Dave]

Best BOL of a great morning:

Watching the “Dick” Go after Bar was DICK spicable.

Thanks!

[volunbeer]

This piece is well done and raises a valid point. It leaves the real danger of this whole mess unspoken by design. This contrived and made up hoax to excuse her loss and cover their tracks for illegal surveillance of a political opponent has made every American less safe.

Russia is not a conventional threat to us. They do not have the economy to support a massive modern military. You are spot on in describing their nuclear capability. This is dangerous for everyone in the world.

Russia is not our friend as they promote their own interests just as we do. They do not have to be our arch enemy either. We will often be on opposite sides of an issue, but having the two leaders of the two largest nuclear arsenals talk and find common ground when possible is a good thing. By depriving Trump and his administration of this ability one can argue that democrats foolishly put politics above our national security.

There is little doubt in the calculation who Russia would like to be in power in the U.S. The left. The policy of the left will restrict our nation financially, neglect our military, be weak on foreign policy, and seek peace through “appeasement”. Trump ran on “peace through strength” and strengthening our economy and he has done both.

Can anyone logically explain to me (beyond Putin’s alleged distaste for Clinton) how Russia preferred Trump and his policy to the continued weakness of the previous administration?

Consider this question with the one factor that people do not pay enough attention to - energy policy. Russia is highly reliant on energy exports to support their economy and military. HRC would have suppressed our energy production not only in the U.S., but throughout the west in the name of climate change. Russia would have exported energy at a higher price.

Trump pledged to expand our energy production and his administration has succeeded far beyond my expectations. This single policy difference has been the most consequential for Russia as we have become a major competitor in energy for them and driven the price down causing them direct economic harm. Russia has far less money to spend militarily because of Trump.

The idea that a few Fakebook ads and alleged protest with a few dozen people somehow influenced a 2 billion dollar election is a complete farce. They did not “hack” our election and likely, like the whole world, expected HRC to win.

I have yet to see a single reliable data point that supports any argument that they changed our election, yet this suggestion is constantly repeated by the media and politicians in both parties. Where is the proof in the Mueller Report?

[oldbrowser]

Conspiracy theories can't be disproven. You can only humiliate and discredit the conspiracy theorists.

Has anyone considered the theory that it was really aliens from outer space, posing as Russians, that stole the election from Hillary?

Can anyone prove I'm wrong?

[NFHale]

“...onging for the good-olde-daze when comedy was not a dirty word with political overtones...”

They’re gone. Like everything else liberals touch. Turns to sh*t in a second.