Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/02/2019 10:28:23 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A small step in the direction of sanity.

I wonder what the international community thinks of American events, in which men compete openly as women, based ONLY on their “gender preference.’


2 posted on 05/02/2019 10:45:57 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This may run counter to some on here, but I’m sort of with Semenya on this... she isn’t “transgender” or taking steroids. Sure she is abnormal physically, but she’s still a woman gender-wise. She just produces more testosterone in her body than others. She shouldn’t have to take drugs to suppress her natural-born chemical makeup just to compete. Steroids or Transgender, I can see disqualification, but naturally-occurring hormones... no.


3 posted on 05/02/2019 10:51:17 PM PDT by Roobarb321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The purpose of women’s sports to provide a competitive space for females that is protected from the overwhelming athletic advantage of maleness.

Allowing maleness into the protected category via doping, transgender athletes, or intersex athletes (Semenya) is grossly unfair.

Since the word “women” is nearly meaningless today, a good step would be to rename the men and women’s sports divisions to “open” and “female”. Only non-doping biological women (XX) could compete in the protected “female”. category. Anyone, male, female, trans, intersex, whatever may compete in the “open” category, subject to male-level doping standards.


10 posted on 05/02/2019 11:14:01 PM PDT by Dagnabitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is not right, it’s her biologically normal levels.

Why didnt anyone demand the williams sisters take T suppressors?


13 posted on 05/02/2019 11:25:32 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 100American; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...

PING!


14 posted on 05/02/2019 11:41:35 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Modern feminism: ALL MEN BAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I think it’s time to start the “Really Special Olympics” open to anyone.


18 posted on 05/03/2019 6:42:34 AM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Don't forget, Semenya was not the only intersex runner beating the females in 2016. Silver and Bronze also went to non-female runners. The grotesque farce of a female-free medal stand (and sobbing trained-for-lifetime actual females) must have pushed the idiots in charge to finally do something.


Olympic Womens event with no medals for a female.


Silver medalist Margaret Wambui


Beauty and the Beasts. The fastest female on the track, Melissa Bishop of Canada, goes home without a medal.

31 posted on 05/03/2019 2:16:55 PM PDT by Dagnabitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

But actual men who ‘identify’ as women can still compete.


34 posted on 05/03/2019 2:29:13 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
.

Cruel Farce: Years of training and max effort not enough for the world's best female 800 meter runners, as they finish behind three testosterone-soaked testes-owning intersex runners.

35 posted on 05/03/2019 2:37:19 PM PDT by Dagnabitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The consequence will be that most winners will now be women with testosterone levels right at, but not over, the limit, since they’ll have the advantage. Setting the limit will become a political battle, no doubt. A high limit equals androgynous winners and a low limit means winners who are more feminine. The leftists who sit on the various governing bodies will of course want higher limits.


36 posted on 05/03/2019 2:51:00 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson