The closer you get to the image the more it just becomes a smudge here and there - you have to view it at least 18 feet away to discern any image; whereas in a painting the closer you get the more detail you see. Spent three days at a Shroud seminar.
Really? I guess you haven’t studied Impressionism.
Well yeah. I mean it’s not made of Van dyke brown and crimson white like a painting. It’s a radioactive occurrence of some sort when its burned into the cloth. No photo that I’ve ever seen reveals more details as a negative than a fade out positive If viewed as a negative, it’s much more defined. All I want to see it exposed as a fraud is it being recreated with the tools of the time. Has yet to be done