Court rules detainees don't have to be held in same state as children

The Hill ^ | 04/16/2019 | Tal Axelrod

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that apprehended migrants do not have the right to be held in the same state as their children while in detention, thrusting the issue of migrant family separations back into the spotlight.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that migrants do not have a “due process right to family unity.”

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

I don't think this is a magic bullet to stop the illegal surge via the family/children loophole. Remember how the fake news media used "separating children from their families." And they are still talking sbout it, even though such separations are now extremely rare.

The article suggests that public opposition to the "zero tolerance" policy was a major cause of the Dems taking over the House.

[cuban leaf]

Well, it matters in California...for obvious reasons. ;)

[butlerweave]

A Mexican State ?

[A Navy Vet]

Does this mean the Trump cages are going to be closed, which started under the Obama administration?

[cpt jack 1]

Pro tip: Only go to counties where you are allowed to be.

[TomGuy]

The more various judges enter their decisions, the more muddled the issue of illegals becomes.

Many of those who sided with Obama era decisions are now siding against the exact same Trump era decisions.

This is CJ Roberts’ bailiwick and he should reign in judges.

[V_TWIN]

“do not have the right to be held in the same state as their children while in detention”

Seeing as they are here ILLEGALLY, they don’t...or at least shouldn’t have any rights IMO.

[joma89]

Good news. Thanks for posting.

JoMa

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

This is CJ Roberts’ bailiwick and he should reign in judges.

Roberts should rein in himself.

Supreme Court rejects Trump's asylum ban in 5-4 ruling as Chief Justice Roberts sides with liberal judges