“WOW! Your sources must be really well informed to allow you to know that nothing is happening there.”
You don’t need “sources” to know that they have produced no results. That is a simple observation anyone can make.
Go ahead and compare it to the Mueller investigation, as you did before. How long did Mueller and his team take before they were convening grand juries, issuing subpoenas, and filing indictments. It certainly doesn’t take two years to begin the first steps of this kind of process.
Yet we see none of that happening with Horowitz and Huber, the Obama appointee tag team, because they obviously have no intention of doing any of that. If they did, we would already see them doing it.
“He didn’t/couldn’t indict anybody. That is a grand jury duty.”
A semantic objection is not a real objection. I guess you can’t argue with the actual logic in my post if you have to nit pick like that. Mueller convened the grand juries, presented the cases, and got the indictments. In colloquial terms, they were Mueller’s indictments, even if he had to use the process of the grand jury to issue them.
“All that money for, basically, process crimes.”
At least he produced some results, even if they weren’t the ultimate results he was going for. Nobody can argue Mueller was doing nothing, unlike Horowitz and Huber.
“You seem so proud of him.”
You brought him up, but I can’t imagine why, since he is the perfect counterexample to your argument. I’m more than happy to point that out.
Just doing something, anything, would be an improvement over the big pile of nothing they are doing so far.
See what I mean?
Go ahead and compare it to the Mueller investigation, as you did before.
Like you're about to do?
How long did Mueller and his team take before they were convening grand juries, issuing subpoenas, and filing indictments.
Clue: Huber/Horowitz aren't Mueller.
Would you agree that Mueller had to keep his investigation in the limelight? Couldn't he have waited until the end of his investigation to bring charges?
Prosecutors have been using grand jury to investigate former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe
At that time, the public knew only the broad outlines of what Horowitz had discovered. In mid-April, the inspector general made public his damaging report. Horowitz referred his findings to the U.S. attorney's office in the District, which at some point launched its own investigation into the former deputy director's conduct.
Get my drift?
Oh, yeah, different situation. Flynn had to be removed from his position ASAP, thus the early indictment and announcement of it.
Never mind. Bad question on my part.
Mueller convened the grand juries, presented the cases, and got the indictments.
So what! That isn't evidence that Huber/Horowitz aren't doing anything like you've asserted.
Nobody can argue Mueller was doing nothing, unlike Horowitz and Huber.
Your suppositions aren't proof of anything. Do you know that a grand jury hasn't been created in the Huber/Horowitz investigations?