Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman
You don’t need “sources” to know that they have produced no results.
You're changing the goalposts.

Just doing something, anything, would be an improvement over the big pile of nothing they are doing so far.
See what I mean?

Go ahead and compare it to the Mueller investigation, as you did before.
Like you're about to do?
How long did Mueller and his team take before they were convening grand juries, issuing subpoenas, and filing indictments.
Clue: Huber/Horowitz aren't Mueller.
Would you agree that Mueller had to keep his investigation in the limelight? Couldn't he have waited until the end of his investigation to bring charges?
Prosecutors have been using grand jury to investigate former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe
At that time, the public knew only the broad outlines of what Horowitz had discovered. In mid-April, the inspector general made public his damaging report. Horowitz referred his findings to the U.S. attorney's office in the District, which at some point launched its own investigation into the former deputy director's conduct.
Get my drift?
Oh, yeah, different situation. Flynn had to be removed from his position ASAP, thus the early indictment and announcement of it.
Never mind. Bad question on my part.

Mueller convened the grand juries, presented the cases, and got the indictments.
So what! That isn't evidence that Huber/Horowitz aren't doing anything like you've asserted.

Nobody can argue Mueller was doing nothing, unlike Horowitz and Huber.
Your suppositions aren't proof of anything. Do you know that a grand jury hasn't been created in the Huber/Horowitz investigations?

30 posted on 04/17/2019 12:30:45 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
Do you know that a grand jury hasn't been created in the Huber/Horowitz investigations?

For that matter...Do you know that referrals haven't already been handed down in the Huber/Horowitz investigations?

Such referrals don't have to be announced to the public, do they?

31 posted on 04/17/2019 12:48:18 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36

“You’re changing the goalposts.”

Excuse me? My very first post made it clear that they have produced no results, as I just said again. What is changing?

“So what! That isn’t evidence that Huber/Horowitz aren’t doing anything like you’ve asserted.”

It’s evidence that it doesn’t take two years to start showing some results if you are actually intending to produce those results. We see no results from Huber and Horowitz, the Obama appointee all-star team hand-picked by super-efficient AG Sessions though. The logical conclusion is that they obviously aren’t that concerned about producing results.

“Your suppositions aren’t proof of anything.”

Neither are your suppositions proof that Sessions’ schmucks are actually accomplishing anything.

“Do you know that a grand jury hasn’t been created in the Huber/Horowitz investigations?”

Where would that theoretical grand jury be convened? In Utah where they can’t indict any of the conspirators? I suppose it might exist, but ain’t nobody seen hide nor hair of it. Maybe it exists but is doing the same thing as Huber and Horowitz, a whole lot of nothing.


32 posted on 04/17/2019 12:49:09 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson