Vatican Cardinal Warns: “West WIll Disappear” Because of Mass Migration

Summit News ^ | April 5, 2019 | Joseph Watson

[gattaca]

Vatican Cardinal Robert Sarah warns that the “west will disappear” as a result of mass migration, adding that “Islam will invade the world” and “completely change culture, anthropology, and moral vision.”

Sarah’s new book, Evening Draws Near and the Day is Nearly Over, is causing controversy in Europe because it explicitly identifies Muslim migration as a harbinger of the continent’s collapse.

“If the West continues in this fatal way, there is a great risk that, due to a lack of birth, it will disappear, invaded by foreigners, just as Rome has been invaded by barbarians,” said Sarah, adding, “My country is predominantly Muslim. I think I know what reality I’m talking about.”

The Cardinal also blamed the European Union for its “desire to globalize the world, ridding it of nations with their distinctive characteristics,” labeling the move “sheer madness”.

“The Brussels Commission thinks only about building a free market in the service of the great financial powers,” he continued. “The European Union no longer protects the peoples within it. It protects the banks.”

In a previous video interview, Sarah warned that Europe had lost its roots and was dying because of fewer European natives having children.

Embedded video

Paul Joseph Watson ✔ @PrisonPlanet If this guy becomes the next Pope, I'm going full trad Catholic.

16.4K 20:55 - 5 Jan 2019 7,949 people are talking about this Twitter Ads information and privacy In recent interviews he has gone even further, noting that priests, bishops and cardinals within the Catholic Church have betrayed the teachings of Christ by pursuing political activism.

Sarah’s comments put him at odds with the Pope, who has relentlessly promoted migration from African and Middle Eastern countries into Europe.

According to the Cardinal, it is wrong to “use the word of God to promote migration,” and it is better “to help people flourish in their culture than to encourage them to come to Europe.”

Sarah slammed mass migration as a “new form of slavery” because migrants end up “without work or dignity”.

“Is that what the Church wants?” he asked.

Sarah remained hopeful of the situation being reversed, asserting, “This is not the end of the world, the Church will rise.”

[Rummyfan]

Sarah’s new book, Evening Draws Near and the Day is Nearly Over, is causing controversy in Europe because it explicitly identifies Muslim migration as a harbinger of the continent’s collapse.

He's right it's a simple numbers game. Muslims come in and proceed to have ten children while many European families are having one, or none, and their birthrate has fallen below replacement levels. I know it's dangerous to make predictions, but project that ahead twenty - thirty - forty years. As Mark Steyn says, the future belongs to who shows up.

Look across European leadership. Merkel - no children. Macron - no children. May - no children... Interesting.

And as for Cardinal Sarah... I wish he was Pope rather than the communist Francesco.

[Rummyfan]

Paul Joseph Watson ✔ @PrisonPlanet If this guy becomes the next Pope, I'm going full trad Catholic.

LOL! PJW you are welcome anytime!

[Rummyfan]

I want to know the exact details of how and WHY Ratzinger went away so mysteriously.

Alzheimer's? Dementia?

[Rummyfan]

Too bad we can’t vote for Pope.

In addition to abolishing the Electoral College, the Dems want to do away with the College of Cardinals.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Archbishop Vigano (google that: Vatican whistleblower who got the scoop on McCarrick and Wuerl, and asked Pope Francis to resign) is is in hiding for exactly that reason. He doesn't want to "catch" cancer or lead poisoning.

It's a shame. Most of us Catholics didn't have any idea that this level of hellish corruption was going on, not even after Roberto Calvi, head of the collapsed Banco Ambrosiano (partnering with the Vatican Bank) was found hanging from Blackfriars Bridge in London. Murder, of course, but there have been no convictions.

[Rummyfan]

But according to Francis, Islam is as good if not better than Christianity...

This Pope... is he trying to destroy The Church?!

[steve86]

“Sarah is the last hope for the Catholic Church.”

That’s just silly. There are millions of orthodox-believing Catholic lay people, probably tens of thousands of good priests, hundreds of good bishops throughout the world, and the Magisterium. The Church ain’t goin’ nowhere. Now, the current Vatican regime, that might be a different story.

Besides, we still have a very good pope: Benedict.

[NorthMountain]

Threats? Coercion?

[onedoug]

I want you to be right. Though with no structure at the top it’s difficult to see.

[Milton Miteybad]

I want to know the exact details of how and WHY Ratzinger went away so mysteriously.

It was far from mysterious. In fact, there was no mystery whatsoever. Pope Benedict voluntarily retired due to mental and physical decline associated with his advanced age. At the time of his retirement, he was the fourth-oldest Pope to hold the office, at the age of 85 years, 318 days. His cardiovascular issues had been known since 2005 by the College of Cardianals, but were not widely known outside that circle.

In retiring from the Papacy, Pope Benedict did what he thought best for himself and the Church. There is no prohibition against a sitting Pope resigning or retiring. He was perfectly within his rights to resign if he so wished.

And now you know. We are happy to have been able to clear away the intellectual fog for you.

[Eagles6]

Yep.

[Vaquero]

Yeah this whole electoral college thing cracks me up. You notice they are not trying to float a new constitutional amendment. Because they know they can’t win. This country is going to have to have a schism. 2 separate countries.

[NorthMountain]

Well ... that cute little fable is the official story.

You can believe as much of it as you like.

[NetAddicted]

Do you have a link to this tweet?

[Milton Miteybad]

Occam's Razor says it's the most likely explanation. Especially since then-Cardinal Ratzinger had in fact intended to retire at the age of 75 (having submitted his resignation as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith three times) due to age-related health issues, but stayed on in that post at the request of Pope John Paul II.

Clearly, Pope Benedict had been considering retirement long before he was elevated to the Papacy.

Now, I know there are a whole boatload of ignorant sniveling morons out there who want to conjure some conspiracy out of Pope Benedict's resignation. And I know you'll want to do everything in your power to avoid being one of them. ;-)

[Mrs. Don-o]

"Alzheimer's? Dementia?"

That would be, compared to some, a comforting hypothesis.

The problem is, it's almost certainly not true.

A couple months after Pope Benedict's abdication, I read he gave a perfectly coherent 45 minute speech to a bunch of academics, speaking -- as is his style--- brilliantly and without notes.

And just one year ago --- the occasion was the fifth anniversary of Pope Francis assuming the papacy --- Benedict refused to write an endorsement of a book on Pope Francis' theology (LINK) and the Vatican Press Office covered itself with disgrace by trying to make it look like Benedict had endorsed it, and were caught at it. Talk about fake news.

So Benedict's mind --- as he approaches his 92nd birthday in just a couple of days ---- seems to be just fine.

I have a much darker theory, but it involves putting on my stylish tinfoil ecclesiastical war-bonnet.

[Mrs. Don-o]

"This Pope... is he trying to destroy The Church?!"

A good topic for a panel discussion. I vote "YES."

There have been other bad popes, but the Peronist Pope is, as far as I can see, absolutely unique. He is the only pope ever to dedicate his papacy to the controlled demolition of Catholic faith and morals.

It's surreal. The leading global opponent of the authentic Papal Magisterium, is this Judas pope.

[NorthMountain]

Your last two sentences are a fine example of "poisoning the well", an illogical and dishonest debate technique employed by those who know (or suspect) that they may be wrong. It serves as an attempt to shut down debate, rather than engaging the merits of an argument.

You lose.

[Milton Miteybad]

Not at all. I wasn't attempting to advance some cockamamie conspiracy theory in an attempt to explain why an 86-year old man might want to retire. Anybody who wants to make that allegation, quite frankly, has no place in the debate in the first place.

Not only were you (and at least one other correspondent) lurking about, trying to insinuate some grand conspiracy surrounding Benedict's resignation when the reasons therefor were plain for all to see, you didn't even have the intellectual courage to describe this conspiracy to which you were apparently referring. ("It couldn't have been that Benedict was an old, sick man who wanted to finally retire after having postponed retirement for 20 years. No...it had to be some big conspiracy!") Then, incredibly, you failed to delineate or describe this alleged conspiracy at all. You offered no proof whatsoever of your assertion of the existence of this alleged "conspiracy." You merely hinted (rather clumsily, we must observe) that there must have been a conspiracy, and then quite laughably, you proceeded to offer absolutely no evidence or reasoning in support of your ludicrous assertion whatsoever.

That's where you lost the debate, Smedley. I merely called your glaring omissions to your attention.

Checkmate. Better luck next time, Ace.

[TBP]

Well, he’s about to be defrocked.

Unless, of course, he molested little boys, in which case Francis the commie will give him a place of honor and high power in the Vatican.