Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ocasio-Cortez mocks Trump’s tax return response: ‘We didn’t ask you’
NY Post ^ | April 3, 2019 | Kenneth Garger

Posted on 04/04/2019 6:29:23 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took a shot at President Trump’s response to Monday’s congressional request for his tax returns, tweeting “we didn’t ask you.”

The twitter jab from the freshman congresswoman came hours after the House Ways and Means Committee asked the IRS to release Trump’s 2013 through 2018 tax returns.

When Trump was later asked about the formal congressional request, he told reporters, “until such time as I’m not under audit, I would not be inclined to do it.”

Ocasio-Cortez mockingly recapped the exchange on Twitter.

“Congress: ‘We’re going to need a copy of the President’s tax returns from 2013-2018,’” read the first part of her tweet.

“No, I’m ‘under audit,” she then wrote, reenacting Trump’s reply.

She finished the tweet with a reminder to Trump, saying “we didn’t ask you.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 116th; aoc; frlovesaoc; iloveaoc; trumptaxes; usefulidiots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Alberta's Child
For ref: It appears Trump has no prerogative to decline which is what I am basing my comments on.

.

U.S. Code 6103

(f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress

(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation

Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer(s)(return) shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.

61 posted on 04/04/2019 8:11:14 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

B*tch needs to be struck by a gigantic lightning bolt.....as a semi-tractor trailer runs her over.


62 posted on 04/04/2019 8:15:14 AM PDT by RooRoobird20 (She will "Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner
Trump can absolutely file a legal challenge to the constitutionality of that law.

I'd be almost certain that this law contradicts other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code protecting the confidentiality of taxpayer records.

63 posted on 04/04/2019 8:15:22 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Occasional Cortex is America’s hemmorhoid!


64 posted on 04/04/2019 8:17:25 AM PDT by RooRoobird20 (She will "Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

......14,000 vote total in a district with 8 percent election turnout. ROFLOL

Looking forward to her continual acts/words of stupidity and her eventual spectacular come-uppance.


65 posted on 04/04/2019 8:20:48 AM PDT by RooRoobird20 (She will "Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Oh, they will. 10 different tax preparers wouldn’t agree on how to apply the thousands of rules. The President’s taxes are so complicated that there’s plenty of room for different “interpretations”.


66 posted on 04/04/2019 8:21:55 AM PDT by goodnesswins (White Privilege EQUALS Self Control & working 50-80 hrs/wk for 40 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

She’s a nasty skank, and bordering on illiterate. Most will see way past the lipstick and boobs.


67 posted on 04/04/2019 8:39:25 AM PDT by Fireone (Build the gallows first, then the wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The other employees on her shifts when she was bartending claim SHE took all the tips.


68 posted on 04/04/2019 8:56:02 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I have always wondered what a layperson might conclude if they suddenly had access to Trump’s income tax returns. PDJT must have the world’s must complicated, convoluted, amortized, leveraged income in the world. I also think that PDJT must have been audited numerous times in his career, to the eventual satisfaction of the IRS. I imagine that the IRS auditors can barely make sense out of the returns.

Now, I perfectly understand underlying reasons behind the demand by Congressional Democrats for PDJT’s returns. Because they are indecipherable, they could provide an endless source of speculation and innuendo for the political grist mill. But in a rational world in which we do not live, PDJT’s tax returns are vetted to the ends of the earth prior to filing and as far as I am aware, whatever disputes he incurred with the IRS over the years have been resolved.


69 posted on 04/04/2019 9:06:19 AM PDT by T. Rustin Noone (the angels wanna wear my red shoes......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

lets see all the demon rats taxes


70 posted on 04/04/2019 9:09:13 AM PDT by angelcindy ("If you follow the crowd...you get no further ,than the crowd")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

“Geez this b!tch is annoying”

she’s like a six year old!


71 posted on 04/04/2019 9:10:30 AM PDT by Samurai_Jack (War is cruelty, there is no use trying to reform it; the crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

This from a woman who has THREE yes THREE FEC Complaints against her, but she knows NOTHING will happen to her, she knows she is above the law


72 posted on 04/04/2019 9:10:32 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

But, they DID ask him, you moron.


73 posted on 04/04/2019 9:11:31 AM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

She will be primaried, just as well, the GOP has enough campaign material from her for several election cycles.

She has done more for than the Repblican party than 98% of the Republican congress.


74 posted on 04/04/2019 9:29:04 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20

“Occasional Cortex is America’s hemmorhoid.”

More like a fissure, I would say.


75 posted on 04/04/2019 9:30:26 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The President should direct the IRS Commissioner to audit every member of Congress since the day they declared their initial candidacy. It would be very interesting to learn how so many relatively low-income people became millionaires by getting elected to Congress.

Expose every source of any income outside their congressional salaries. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.


76 posted on 04/04/2019 9:31:29 AM PDT by CarmichaelPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

Seems to me that maybe it’s high time for AOC to close her pie hole; at least in relation to other folks’ taxes & personal matters that are basically none of her business.


77 posted on 04/04/2019 10:37:12 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
There is no reason to ask. There is no reason to comply.

The nasty little tyrant AOC doesn't care.

Trump is her political enemy.

She wants Trump's tax returns NOW!!

This is what totalitarianism looks like.

78 posted on 04/04/2019 10:37:33 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Hate to break it to you, but the liquidation value of an architectural firm is about 0$. Some drafting tables, printers and software licenses that need to be upgraded to get the latest version, a flower pot or two and some cardboard models. Probably the most valuable thing is the large scale printer.

This is true, but if it were a partnership, had pending contracts, and the other partner was another architect, and the firm continued under the other partner/architect, the survivors would be entitled to 50% of the profits. Which is why I said if it were a partnership, the most likely path would have been for the other partner to buy out the survivor's interest.

The name of AOC's father's company was "Kirschenbaum & Ocasio-Roman Architects, PC". Ocasio-Roman was her father's surname. He was the CEO and President. Alex Kirschenbaum was the Vice President. The firm was a certified minority business enterprise. The firm was likely organized as an LLC. They were a pretty significant firm based on this article:

Former Parkchester South architects sue board and CPC.

"Ocasio alleges that this statement led to a loss of reputation tor his firm. He said the firm has contracts with the city of Mt. Vernon to renovate 500 public housing apartments as well as a federal construction project of 80 units of senior housing op Melrose Ave. in the Bronx. Such contracts show his firm's familiarity with the work the condo expected him to do. "

They were suing for $15 million on a lost bid of $420,000. I assume there was a settlement. I doubt it was anywhere near $15M, a few hundred grand and legal fees is not unbelievable. Also a minority owned business suing over a lost bid has the power to scare others into accepting their bid.

I once met a former Air Force civil engineer that left the Air Force and started a firm bidding on the remodeling of Air Force enlisted dorms. He was a Latino, and his firm was certified as a minority owned business. He became a millionaire a a couple of years.

Alex Kirschenbaum apparently is still an architect today, under the business "Alex Kirschenbaum Architects". He likely would not qualify as a minority owned business. However, if the partnership ownership passed to AOC's mother, it should have maintained its minority status until that ownership interest was sold or dissolved.

I am really starting to doubt AOC's story. Nowhere does she claim her father's partner screwed her, her mom, and her brother. There is talk of pending foreclosure, etc., but nothing about the business. But nobody from the mainstream media apparently has thought to try to interview Kirschenbaum. This is so Obamaesque. And AOC is so defensive.

79 posted on 04/04/2019 10:45:46 AM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: magellan
I would add, I believe the address of "Kirschenbaum & Ocasio-Roman Architects" was the old Bronx condo her father owned. That may have explained why they kept the condo when they moved to Westchester.
80 posted on 04/04/2019 10:52:02 AM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson