1 posted on
03/16/2019 10:50:27 PM PDT by
thecodont
To: thecodont
Bull crap! Assume ALL voting machines are potentially not secure and are subject to manipulation. ALWAYS have paper ballots that can be audited when/where necessary.
2 posted on
03/16/2019 10:55:49 PM PDT by
House Atreides
(Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
To: thecodont
I don’t care what they say. I wouldn’t trust this system one bit. What I trust are all the old manual systems that have not had all of there checks and balances removed.
Of course none of it does any good if you don’t verify who is actually voting.
3 posted on
03/16/2019 10:57:05 PM PDT by
Revel
To: thecodont
4 posted on
03/16/2019 10:57:08 PM PDT by
TChad
To: thecodont
NSA will give final approval.
5 posted on
03/16/2019 11:31:33 PM PDT by
867V309
(Lock Her Up)
To: thecodont
Okay ... do a bunch of stuff electronically, but always have the initial paper ballot. That’s essential.
7 posted on
03/17/2019 12:34:09 AM PDT by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: thecodont
as long as it has paper receipts and publishes all votes to a public block chain... then your vote can be verified and the chain can be checked against any tampering
8 posted on
03/17/2019 12:50:45 AM PDT by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: thecodont
So the same people who tap our phones, track our lives through Facebook, and police the Internet through fronts that purport to spot “fake news” also want to secure our voting system—goodie, I feel more secure already. /s
9 posted on
03/17/2019 12:54:53 AM PDT by
Fedora
To: thecodont
To prevent voting more than once:
11 posted on
03/17/2019 1:09:07 AM PDT by
Jyotishi
(Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
To: thecodont
A project like this needs someone in charge who is universally trusted with a sterling reputation, like Robert Mueller. /s
To: thecodont
Oregon-based firm called Galois, a longtime government contractor
This in itself says volumes
To: thecodont
Doesn’t matter how secure the voting is - it matters who counts the votes.
15 posted on
03/17/2019 2:55:56 AM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: thecodont
It doesn’t matter how “secure” it is, if non citizens get to vote, if people vote multiple times due to multiple residences, or if others vote for the elderly.
17 posted on
03/17/2019 4:22:38 AM PDT by
SauronOfMordor
(Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
To: thecodont
I can make you win, but it will cost you.
18 posted on
03/17/2019 4:28:43 AM PDT by
McGruff
To: thecodont
Id rather they register your eye scan. Pass it as a citizen, go vote. Fail it as a non-citizen or a multiple time voter, blinded immediately.
22 posted on
03/17/2019 5:53:56 AM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
To: thecodont
DARPA being tied to the bureaucracy, has a dog in this fight and I wouldn’t trust any DARPA voting system any more than I trust the vote counters in Broward County.
25 posted on
03/17/2019 6:55:07 AM PDT by
arthurus
(sg)
To: thecodont
Look up the political contributions for Galois for 2016. They all went to crazy Bernie.
28 posted on
03/17/2019 8:23:52 AM PDT by
aimhigh
(THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
To: PROCON; Twotone; VeryFRank; Clinging Bitterly; Rio; aimhigh; Hieronymus; bray; 1malumprohibitum; ...
If you would like more information about what’s happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me. Please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list.
31 posted on
02/08/2021 5:47:16 AM PST by
Twotone
(While one may vote oneself into socialism one has to shoot oneself out of it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson