Bull crap! Assume ALL voting machines are potentially not secure and are subject to manipulation. ALWAYS have paper ballots that can be audited when/where necessary.
If FR had one, I'd give your post a
Yep.
Two cybersecurity experts who hacked into the last NSW election voting system have raised security concerns about next months poll.
In 2015, Professor Teague and her Melbourne University colleague Chris Culnane exposed a major security hole in the online voting platform that could have allowed hackers to manipulate the votes without users knowing.
After alerting government agencies to the potential breach, the security concern was resolved.
But Dr Culnane says there are still too many risks and uncontrollable factors in any online voting project.
Whilst convenience [of voting] is definitely an attribute we should strive towards, it shouldnt be the primary attribute. The primary one should be the security and verifiability of that vote, he said.
In a paper count, if the papers are looked after, you can always go back in the case of a dispute and check whether there has been an error or not, she said.
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/exclusive-nsw-election-vulnerable-to-another-hack
Democrats have been cheating since Tamany Hall... paper ballots did not deter them. They just used population-replacement, targeted immigration, and lawfare to legalize the methodology or to make sure there was no remedy when fraud, even obvious fraud, comes to light so that fraudulent ballots still get counted.