Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Unveil Bill To Protect Journalists. The So-Called Threat Is Stupid.
Townhall ^ | 3/13/2019 | Beth Baumann

Posted on 03/13/2019 3:25:07 AM PDT by BadLands59

A handful of Democrats on Tuesday introduced the Journalist Protection Act, which makes it a federal crime to cause bodily harm to a journalist or intimidate him or her from gathering information for a news report. The bill was brought about by Rep. Eric Swalwell (CA), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT) and Bob Menendez (NJ).

According to the trio, it was important for them to introduce this bill because of President Donald Trump's "extreme hostility toward the press." The group cites Trump's standoff with CNN over "fake news" and him calling the press “the enemy of the American people,” as examples.

The group believes Trump's so-called rhetoric on the mainstream media is to blame for Americans' stance on reporters and the news media. And, without coming out and directly saying it, they're blaming Trump for journalists getting attacked in the field. In these legislators' mind, these attacks wouldn't take place if Trump didn't use his rhetoric to wind people up.

“From tweeting #FakeNews to proclaiming his contempt for the media during campaign rallies, the President has created a hostile environment for members of the press,” Swalwell said. “A healthy democracy depends on a free press unencumbered by threats of violence. We must protect journalists in every corner of our country if they are attacked physically while doing their job, and send a strong, clear message that such violence will not be tolerated. That is what my bill, the Journalist Protection Act, would do.”

“Under this administration, reporters face a near-constant barrage of verbal threats, casting the media as enemies of the American people and possible targets of violence. This bill makes clear that engaging in any kind of violence against members of the media will simply not be tolerated," Blumenthal said.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Rep. Eric Swalwell (CA), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (CT) and Bob Menendez (NJ). Certainly nice to see that these boys are only interested in the well-being of those poor, persecuted journalists.
1 posted on 03/13/2019 3:25:07 AM PDT by BadLands59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

Does this mean Sarah Sanders couldn’t slap around Jim Acosta anymore? She actually hasn’t done enough against him as it is.


2 posted on 03/13/2019 3:31:33 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

>> which makes it a federal crime to cause bodily harm to a journalist or intimidate him or her from gathering information for a news report.

Bullstalin. Obama locked up filmmakers he disapproved of and spied on a journalist’s computer.


3 posted on 03/13/2019 3:31:42 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

They know the media/Dem collusion is about to be outed.


4 posted on 03/13/2019 3:34:35 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

I guess editorializing is just fine unless it’s against the editorializers. Freedom of speech for me but not for thee.


5 posted on 03/13/2019 3:34:40 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

Should have a law to protect the public against fake news.


6 posted on 03/13/2019 3:36:59 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

DEMocracy?


7 posted on 03/13/2019 3:42:20 AM PDT by W. (Natty Light: The beer so nice, you'll taste it twice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

“Can we get some muscle over here?”


8 posted on 03/13/2019 3:42:44 AM PDT by heartwood (Someone has to play devil's advocate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
Does this mean Sarah Sanders couldn’t slap around Jim Acosta anymore?

No, this bill would only protect real journalists, (i.e., those that are actually unbiased), NOT Democrat propagandists - so most of Big Media would obviously still remain uncovered.

Slap away, Sarah


9 posted on 03/13/2019 3:44:19 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Obama launched a vicious attack, harassed his family and sicced his DOJ and Eric Holder on a journo who had the gall to criticize him.

STROLL DOWN MEMORY LANE--- REMEMBER THIS?---At a recent
comeback to repaint his miserable 8-year term, Obama lacerated Pres Trump:
" I complained plenty about Fox News, but you never heard me call them enemies of the people.”

REALITY CHECK----N-o-o-o-o, Obama didnt do that....he just unleashed the full force of the DOJ, in the person of AG Eric Holder, to pounce on Fox reporter James Rosen AND to intimidate Rosen's family. Holder and Obama issued a court order for Fox News reporter James Rosen's emails, that labeled Rosen a criminal "co-conspirator." More likely Fox News said things or published stories Obama didn't like.......or got too close to unveiling his criminality.

==================================================

SOURCE theguardian.com
Circa 2013

Obama and AG Holder did more than seize a Fox News reporter’s emails while suggesting he was a criminal “co-conspirator” in a leak case — it did so under one of the most serious wartime laws in America, the Espionage Act. It is now well known that the Obama justice department has prosecuted more government leakers under the 1917 Espionage Act than all prior administrations combined - in fact, double the number of all such prior prosecutions.

But as the controversy over the Obama and Holder’s pursuit of the phone records of AP reporters illustrated, this obsessive fixation in defense of secrecy also targets, and severely damages, journalists specifically and the news-gathering process in general.

New revelations emerged yesterday in the Washington Post that are perhaps the most extreme yet when it comes to the DOJ’s attacks on press freedoms. It involves the prosecution of State Department adviser Stephen Kim, a naturalized citizen from South Korea who was indicted in 2009 for allegedly telling Fox News’ chief Washington correspondent, James Rosen, that US intelligence believed North Korea would respond to additional UN sanctions with more nuclear tests - something Rosen then reported. Kim did not obtain unauthorized access to classified information, nor steal documents, nor sell secrets, nor pass them to an enemy of the US.

Instead, the DOJ alleges that he merely communicated this innocuous information to a journalist - something done every day in Washington - and, for that, this arms expert and long-time government employee faces more than a decade in prison for “espionage”.

The focus of a Post report is that the Obama DOJ’s surveillance of Rosen extended far beyond even what Obama did to AP reporters. The FBI tracked Rosen’s movements in and out of the State Department, traced the timing of his calls, and - most amazingly - obtained a search warrant to read two days worth of his emails, as well as all of his emails with Kim. In this case, said the Post, “investigators did more than obtain telephone records of a working journalist suspected of receiving the secret material.” It added that “court documents in the Kim case reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist”.

But what makes this revelation particularly disturbing is that Obama's DOJ, in order to get this search warrant, insisted that Fox's Rosen - a journalist - committed serious crimes. The DOJ specifically argued that by encouraging his source to disclose classified information - something investigative journalists do every day - Rosen himself broke the law.

Describing an affidavit from FBI agent Reginald Reyes filed by the DOJ, the Post reports [emphasis added]: “Reyes wrote that there was evidence Rosen had broken the law, ‘at the very least, either as an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator’. That fact distinguishes his case from the probe of the AP, in which the news organization is not the likely target. Using italics for emphasis, Reyes explained how Rosen allegedly used a ‘covert communications plan’ and quoted from an e-mail exchange between Rosen and Kim that seems to describe a secret system for passing along information. . . .

However, it remains an open question whether it’s ever illegal, given the First Amendment’s protection of press freedom, for a reporter to solicit information. No reporter, including Rosen, has been prosecuted for doing so.” Under US law, it is not illegal to publish classified information. That fact, along with the First Amendment’s guarantee of press freedoms, is what has prevented the US government from ever prosecuting journalists for reporting on what the US government does in secret. This newfound theory of the Obama DOJ - that a journalist can be guilty of crimes for “soliciting” the disclosure of classified information - is a means for circumventing those safeguards and criminalizing the act of investigative journalism itself.

These latest revelations show that this is not just a theory but one put into practice, as the Obama and Holder submitted official court documents accusing a journalist of committing crimes by doing this. ---Snip---

==================================

Obama and Holder wouldnt lie to a court of law. Would they? (smirk)

10 posted on 03/13/2019 3:46:13 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

Until a conservative is threatened. Then the question will be: Is he a real journaist?


11 posted on 03/13/2019 3:46:14 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

Dems gotta protect their propaganda arm.....


12 posted on 03/13/2019 3:59:26 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

Social media is already doing this. These outlets just want the government to sponsor and protect media censoring.


13 posted on 03/13/2019 3:59:50 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Don’t forget banning Fox news.


14 posted on 03/13/2019 4:02:01 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

Banning is one thing. He punished people (the youtube filmmaker falsely blamed for Benghazi and Dinesh D’souza) and spied on a CBS reporter.

https://nypost.com/2014/10/27/ex-cbs-reporter-government-related-entity-bugged-my-computer/


15 posted on 03/13/2019 4:04:56 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

“In her book, Attkisson says CBS lost interest in her coverage of the deadly attack on the US Embassy in Benghazi, Libya, and killed her stories of the federal “Fast and Furious” gun-running scandal.”


16 posted on 03/13/2019 4:06:29 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

The press is a bunch of baying hounds, tools


17 posted on 03/13/2019 4:22:05 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

It just means I will continue not watching the establishment press and their garbage. They might as well be sponsoring legislation to protect Lucky Charms breakfast cereal or places like Pizza Hut or McDonalds or Burger King or Wendy’s for eating out at lunch or dinner for all I care, as I don’t bother with that sort of thing either.


18 posted on 03/13/2019 4:41:23 AM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("The Gardens was founded by men-sportsmen-who fought for their country" Conn Smythe, 1966)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BadLands59

I wonder if this includes joe doakes running a blog read by 3 people in podunk anywhere ?
If not....Congress shall make no law...

We need to have a database of registered journalists and their registered devices (PC, IPhone, Android, Laptop, Tablet etc...)
10 day waiting period to check credentials.
$25 a year fee for annual renewal.
Any mental health or felony issues crop up, devices must be forfeited.


19 posted on 03/13/2019 4:45:42 AM PDT by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
<>"Obama locked up filmmakers he disapproved of and spied on a journalist’s computer."<>

Yes, but that was then, this is NOW!

Kinda depends upon who's ox is being gored.

20 posted on 03/13/2019 4:50:22 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Tired of kissing Banker Butt! Hurrah, Andrew Jackson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson