Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
Slavery wasn't going to expand anywhere. I've proven this over and over again by posting modern maps of Cotton growing.

Thomas Jackson owned as many as 10 slaves at points during his adult life. Are you saying that Jackson and men like him would look at the territories and say, "Well since cotton won't grow there then that nowhere I would want to live?"

Not all slaves worked the fields. Or weren't you aware of that.

475 posted on 03/27/2019 3:33:36 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

Vast bulk of them did. It is irrational to think the tail wags the dog.


484 posted on 03/27/2019 7:54:36 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg; DiogenesLamp
DoodleDawg: "Not all slaves worked the fields.
Or weren't you aware of that."

In 1840 about half of all US slaves lived in the Deep Cotton South, by 1860 it was almost 60%.
But that still left 40%, about 1.5 million slaves, in non-cotton Upper & Border South states.
Even in cotton states a fair guess would be only 80% of slaves worked cotton, meaning, overall roughly half of US slaves worked cotton.

Point is: cotton was unnecessary to support millions of slaves.

494 posted on 03/27/2019 11:26:55 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson