Actually, DiogenesLamp has no idea what I may have "so eloquently" pointed out because, by his own admission he refuses to read my posts.
So his claim that I am "clearly incorrect factually" is merely an argument from ignorance -- he doesn't know it to be true (won't read it) so claims it's false.
DiogenesLamp: "As Franklin said, 'One of the greatest tragedies of life is the murder of a beautiful theory by a gang of brutal facts.' "
Franklin was indeed the author of many pithy quotes, but this one in particular is not cited by more reputable quote sources -- it sounds "off" for his time & station.
Regardless, your Marxist smearing of 1860s Republicans, especially Lincoln, are far from a "beautiful theory", they are ugly & disgraceful but somehow immune to whatever "brutal facts" may discredit them.
DiogenesLamp: "The founders put no conditions on the right to independence.
They listed their "causes" as a courtesy,"
Of course they did put, listed clearly in plain sight -- the first condition is "necessity" and another is "a long train of abuses & usurpations" of which they then itemized about two dozen, including:
DiogenesLamp: "One does not have to explain one's reasons for wanting to disassociate from people whom they saw as exploiting them."
Of course, as a free individual you are entitled to associate or disassociate yourself from whomever you wish -- within the defined limits of contracts you've agreed to.
But townships, counties, cities & states?
Not so much, according to our Founders' examples: they said it took necessity created by a long train of abuses & usurpations, etc.
Franklin was indeed the author of many pithy quotes, but this one in particular is not cited by more reputable quote sources -- it sounds "off" for his time & station.
It does. You can find it attributed to Franklin online, but it sounds too modern for him. Would he have used "gang" so freely? Was "beautiful theory" a concept in 18th century America? Or was it something a 20th century scientist was more likely to say?
You can also find the quote attributed to the 17th century Duc de La Rochefoucauld, but that's no more likely. Herbert Spencer and Thomas Henry Huxley are more likely sources. I suspect it's one of those ideas that gets polished and reworked over time. Whoever said something like that first, later writers adapted it to their own time.