Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg; BroJoeK

With all the money being funneled back through New York. I think even BroJoeK admits New York controlled the Southern export market.


372 posted on 03/20/2019 4:31:07 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
With all the money being funneled back through New York.

You have a qualifier for almost every claim you make, don't you?

374 posted on 03/20/2019 4:43:09 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp; DoodleDawg
DiogenesLamp: "With all the money being funneled back through New York.
I think even BroJoeK admits New York controlled the Southern export market."

I do freely admit that from 1801 through 1861 Northern Democrats in New York allied with Southern Democrats ruling Washington DC both controlled and benefitted by those "money flows from Europe".
What I don't accept is that the 1861 "divorce" of Northern & Southern Democrats somehow caused Republicans to "launch war" against "the South".

Any Lost Causer evidence for it is both disputed historiographical-ly and denied by public statements from all parties at the time.

Slavery was the reason for secession.
Rebellion at Fort Sumter was the reason for Civil War.
Slavery was of growing importance during the war, almost from Day One.

Facts.

396 posted on 03/21/2019 5:44:02 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson