[FLT-bird]

Bull Snipe:

Lee’s army was penned in Petersburg, Sherman was about to start his march across Georgia. In one month, Hood’s Army of Tennessee would be crushed outside of Nashville. The city of Savannah would surrender to Sherman. Flour was 500 Confederate dollars a barrel, if you could find it. 95% of Southern ports were sealed off due to the U.S. Navy blockade. Two million slaves were now free because of the Union Army. The South was down to offering emancipation in exchange for Diplomatic recognition. Davis proposed enlisting 40,000 slave to support the Confederate Army. With a couple of months the Confederate Congress would consider enlisting slaves as soldiers. These acts are a pretty good indicator of how low the Confederacy had sunk.

You say "penned" in Petersburg. I'd say they were entrenched there blocking the Union Army and the Union Army had been unable to dislodge them. The whole point about allowing Blacks to serve in the Confederate Army was something the Confederate Congress had drug its heels on. It was always limited in scope. Several states allowed it from early on and Confederate officers in the field had been simply ignoring the Confederate Congress' dictate on that for years. They offered to abolish slavery in exchange for diplomatic recognition and they turned down multiple offers of compensated emancipation from the federal government.....and in anticipation of the inevitable no, I'm not going to look it up. Y'all are all out of those for this thread. Look it up for yourself - yes, it happened. Just as the original 7 seceding states turned down slavery forever by express constitutional amendment. Obviously, slavery was not what the Southern states were fighting over just its not what the Northern states were fighting over.

[Bull Snipe]

Which Confederate States had laws that allowed slaves to serve in the regiments raised by that state and sent off to serve in the Confederate Army.

“Obviously, slavery was not what the Southern states were fighting over.”
If that was the case, why did the Confederacy wait until Nov 1864 to offer Emancipation as bargaining chip to lure the Brits and French into diplomatically recognizing the Southern Confederacy. Why not 1861 or 1862. The answer, in those years the Confederacy had an expectation of victory.
By Nov 1864 that expectations had evaporated. Emancipation for diplomatic recognition was a “Hail Mary” pass by a dying Confederacy.

[BroJoeK]

FLT-bird: "Obviously, slavery was not what the Southern states were fighting over just its not what the Northern states were fighting over."

Then there were these quotes:

1. 1849: "Henry L. Benning, Georgia politician and future Confederate general, writing in the summer of 1849 to his fellow Georgian, Howell Cobb:
   'First then, it is apparent, horribly apparent, that the slavery question rides insolently over every other everywhere -- in fact that is the only question which in the least affects the results of the elections.'
   [Allan Nevins, The Fruits of Manifest Destiny pages 240-241.] Later in the same letter Benning says,
   'I think then, 1st, that the only safety of the South from abolition universal is to be found in an early dissolution of the Union.' "
   
   
2. 1856: "Richmond Enquirer, 1856:
   'Democratic liberty exists solely because we have slaves . . . freedom is not possible without slavery.' "

3. 1858: "Albert Gallatin Brown, U.S. Senator from Mississippi, speaking with regard to the several filibuster expeditions to Central America:
   'I want a foothold in Central America... because I want to plant slavery there....
   I want Cuba,... Tamaulipas, Potosi, and one or two other Mexican States;
   and I want them all for the same reason - for the planting or spreading of slavery'
   [Battle Cry of Freedom, p. 106.]"

4. 1859 -- "Richard Thompson Archer (Mississippi planter):
   'The South is invaded.
   It is time for all patriots to be united, to be under military organization, to be advancing to the conflict determined to live or die in defence of the God given right to own the African'
   ---letter to the Vicksburg Sun, Dec. 8, 1859."

5. 1859: "Senator Robert M. T. Hunter of Virginia:
   'There is not a respectable system of civilization known to history whose foundations were not laid in the institution of domestic slavery.'
   [Battle Cry of Freedom, p. 56.]"

6. 1860: "Atlanta Confederacy, 1860:
   'We regard every man in our midst an enemy to the institutions of the South, who does not boldly declare that he believes African slavery to be a social, moral, and political blessing.' "

7. 1860: "Lawrence Keitt, Congressman from South Carolina, in a speech to the House on January 25, 1860:
   'African slavery is the corner-stone of the industrial, social, and political fabric of the South; and whatever wars against it, wars against her very existence.
   Strike down the institution of African slavery and you reduce the South to depopulation and barbarism.'
   Later in the same speech he said,
   'The anti-slavery party contend that slavery is wrong in itself, and the Government is a consolidated national democracy.
   We of the South contend that slavery is right, and that this is a confederate Republic of sovereign States.'
   Taken from a photocopy of the Congressional Globe supplied by Steve Miller."

8. 1860: "Keitt again, this time as delegate to the South Carolina secession convention, during the debates on the state's declaration of causes:
   'Our people have come to this on the question of slavery.
   I am willing, in that address to rest it upon that question.
   I think it is the great central point from which we are now proceeding, and I am not willing to divert the public attention from it.'
   Taken from the Charleston, South Carolina, Courier, dated Dec. 22, 1860.
   See the Furman documents site for more transcription from these debates.
   Keitt became a colonel in the Confederate army and was killed at Cold Harbor on June 1, 1864."

9. 1860: "Senator Louis Trezevant Wigfall; December 11, 1860, on the floor of the Senate;
   'I said that one of the causes, and the one that has created more excitement and dissatisfaction than any other, is, that the Government will not hereafter, and when it is necessary, interpose to protect slaves as property in the Territories;
   and I asked the Senator if he would abandon his squatter-sovereignty notions and agree to protect slaves as all other property?'
   [Quote taken from The Congressional Globe, 36th Cong., 2nd Sess., p. 58.]"

10. 1860: "Alfred P. Aldrich, South Carolina legislator from Barnwell:
    'If the Republican party with its platform of principles, the main feature of which is the abolition of slavery and, therefore, the destruction of the South, carries the country at the next Presidential election, shall we remain in the Union, or form a separate Confederacy?
    This is the great, grave issue.
    It is not who shall be President, it is not which party shall rule --- it is a question of political and social existence.'
    [Steven Channing, Crisis of Fear, pp. 141-142.]"

11. 1861: "Henry M. Rector, Governor of Arkansas, March 2, 1861, Arkansas Secession Convention, p. 44
    'The area of slavery must be extended correlative with its antagonism, or it will be put speedily in the 'course of ultimate extinction.'....
    The extension of slavery is the vital point of the whole controversy between the North and the South...
    Amendments to the federal constitution are urged by some as a panacea for all the ills that beset us.
    That instrument is amply sufficient as it now stands, for the protection of Southern rights, if it was only enforced.
    The South wants practical evidence of good faith from the North, not mere paper agreements and compromises.
    They believe slavery a sin, we do not, and there lies the trouble.' "

12. 1861: "Thomas F. Goode, Mecklenburg County, Virginia, March 28, 1861, Virginia Secession Convention, vol. II, p. 518,
    'Sir, the great question which is now uprooting this Government to its foundation---the great question which underlies all our deliberations here, is the question of African slavery...' "

13. 1861: "John Tyler Morgan, Dallas County, Alabama; also speaking to the Alabama Secession Convention on January 25, 1861:
    The Ordinance of Secession rests, in a great measure, upon our assertion of a right to enslave the African race, or, what amounts to the same thing, to hold them in slavery.' "

14. 1862: "The Vidette, a camp newspaper for Confederate Brig. Gen. John Hunt Morgan's cavalry brigade.
    In one of the November, 1862 issues, the following appeared:
    "...any man who pretends to believe that this is not a war for the emancipation of the blacks, and that the whole course of the Yankee government has not only been directed to the abolition of slavery, but even to a stirring up of servile insurrections, is either a fool or a liar.' "

15. 1863: "William Nugent to Eleanor Nugent, Sept 7, 1863:
    'This country without slave labor would be completely worthless.
    We can only live & exist by that species of labor; and hence I am willing to fight for the last.'
    [James McPherson, For Cause and Comrades, p. 107]"

16. 1863: "Methodist Rev. John T. Wightman, preaching at Yorkville, South Carolina:
    'The triumphs of Christianity rest this very hour upon slavery; and slavery depends on the triumphs of the South . . .
    This war is the servant of slavery.'
    [The Glory of God, the Defence of the South (1861), cited in Eugene Genovese's Consuming Fire (1998).]"

17. 1864: "Catherine Ann Devereux Edmonston, December 30, 1864:
    'We have hitherto contended that Slavery was Cuffee's normal condition, the very best position he could occupy, the one of all others in which he was happiest... No!
    Freedom for whites, slavery for negroes.
    God has so ordained it.'
    From: The Journal of a Secesh Lady: The Diary of Catherine Ann Devereux Edmonston, 1860-1866."

18. 1864: "CS Brigadier General Clement Stevens:
    'If slavery is to be abolished then I take no more interest in our fight.
    The justification of slavery in the South is the inferiority of the negro.
    If we make him a soldier, we concede the whole question.'
    [Cited in James C. Nisbet, Four Years on the Firing Line, pp. 172--173; my thanks to Jon Morrison, of Dalton, GA, for pointing me to this item.]"

At the time, slavery was on everyone's mind.