Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FLT-bird

Where in the Confederate Constitution grants Davis or the Confederate Congress the authority to negotiate away their rights. They were “still very much in the war” just as the Germans were “still very much in the war” with the Soviet Army on the outskirts of Berlin.


201 posted on 03/15/2019 2:53:54 AM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Snipe; DoodleDawg; FLT-bird

Bird-brain is hopelessly incapable of recognizing that either the confederates had a viable, functional constitution or they didn’t (hint: they did not). If they did, and it said what the confed constitution said, they would need to amend it to make their proposed treaty legal. If they were able to so casually subvert their constitution it meant that it wasn’t worth the paper it was scribbled on.

They couldn’t have it both ways. But (being democrats) that is exactly what they wanted to do - have it both ways. They wanted to pretend to a struggle for “freedom” but a freedom built upon the forced labor of other human beings. They wanted to hold their neighbor to the letter of the law even while they blithely trampled on it. They had the cheek to go to various European governments begging for assistance in their unholy scheme while simultaneously saying, “Don’t pay attention to what we’re doing - pay attentions to what we’re saying!”

I’m surprised that they didn’t fail due to sheer hubris.


203 posted on 03/15/2019 6:42:31 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: Bull Snipe

This has been asked and answered already in the discussion with and reply to DoodleDawg.


208 posted on 03/15/2019 11:28:21 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: Bull Snipe
FACT: -Lincoln responded to this criticism in a letter on April 1, 1861 stating he is .... To Horace Greeley (published in NY Tribune) ... -Lincoln's official duty and goal is to save the union, not either to save or destroy slavery -neither pro-slavery or radical abolitionist -"If I could save the Union without freeing any slaves I would do it".

This was Abe's War...the North had a "Civil War"; the South did not have a Civil War, the South wanted to Secede as did some of the other states in the North....Lincoln was a Tyrant, jailed those who disagreed with him and broke Constitutional Law where he pleased in order to keep on fighting....The Civil War was like all wars, horrible...the Union soldiers were like all conquering soldiers, they raped women, black and white, raped children, pillaged, stole, killed all animals.....that history was buried, it is now available.

234 posted on 03/17/2019 9:55:43 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson