Bird-brain is hopelessly incapable of recognizing that either the confederates had a viable, functional constitution or they didn’t (hint: they did not). If they did, and it said what the confed constitution said, they would need to amend it to make their proposed treaty legal. If they were able to so casually subvert their constitution it meant that it wasn’t worth the paper it was scribbled on.
They couldn’t have it both ways. But (being democrats) that is exactly what they wanted to do - have it both ways. They wanted to pretend to a struggle for “freedom” but a freedom built upon the forced labor of other human beings. They wanted to hold their neighbor to the letter of the law even while they blithely trampled on it. They had the cheek to go to various European governments begging for assistance in their unholy scheme while simultaneously saying, “Don’t pay attention to what we’re doing - pay attentions to what we’re saying!”
I’m surprised that they didn’t fail due to sheer hubris.
Ah yes. Rocks in his head is back to his usual level of stupidity. He has no quotes, facts or sources. So he just goes playground every time.