[BroJoeK]

FLT-bird: "True....then again that a man was a man of his time or that he was more moderate than most or that he treated those around him kindly has never been a defense when the PC Revisionists were attacking Southern figures.
Seems rather unbalanced to show such understanding for only one side while showing none for the other."

So, do we understand this correctly?
FLT-bird tells us that since "PC-Revisionists" attack Confederates unfairly, he, FLT-bird, is duty bound to attack Lincoln unfairly?
Is that the deal?
When they stop attacking Confederates unfairly then FLT-bird will stop attacking Lincoln unfairly??

I think we should take some time to think this over before responding too rashly.

Agreed?

FLT-bird: "As for Lincoln he'd fall near the bottom of the scale given he started the bloodiest war in American history, trashed the constitution, was willing to enshrine slavery effectively forever in the constitution, committed all sorts of war crimes and committed genocide and ethnic cleansing against native people."

Is this an example of the kind of unfair attack on Lincoln which FLT-bird offers to stop, once others stop unfairly attacking Confederates?

Really?

[FLT-bird]

We’ve gone down this road hundreds if not thousands of times before. I am not going to waste my time with your responding to respond posts in which you endlessly spew your ignorant and false PC Revisionist drivel.

3rd attempt.