Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

My health and dental and vision insurance is a national company. Fedvip is a nationalized umbrella why wouldn’t that work? I don’t understand. I think it’s a lobbying issue and K Street is dominating Congressional thought on national insurance coverage rather than state by state with defined borders for regions of insurance providers.


3 posted on 03/07/2019 5:49:06 AM PST by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Clutch Martin
My health and dental and vision insurance is a national company.

So are Prudential, New York Life, State Farm, Progressive, Aetna, etc.

They are still regulated at the state level, so every insurance policy they sell must meet the regulatory requirements of the individual state where it is sold. I believe most of these companies maintain separate subsidiaries in each state where they operate.

7 posted on 03/07/2019 5:52:47 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Clutch Martin

I have heard doctors on Sean Hannity show describing very low prices for their network. Competition works to lower prices.


8 posted on 03/07/2019 5:52:48 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Clutch Martin
It's not a "K Street" issue. It's a matter of insurance companies lobbying heavily at the state level, not in Washington.

The McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 stipulated that the insurance industry could not be regulated at the Federal level. This is because Congress determined that an insurance policy is a contract, not a commercial purchase ... and contract law comes under the jurisdiction of state courts.

12 posted on 03/07/2019 5:56:06 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Clutch Martin

it wont work because of how much power states have over insurance companies.

the reason insurance is so much cheaper in some states than others... is “all” about interferance by the states themselves.

If California forces all insurance companies that sell insurance in the state to offer free maternity care for instance.. and other states dont.. then insurance will be cheaper when purchased outside of California. So on the surface it looks like you would save money if you were able to buy insurance from another state. BUT that’s assuming the state would allow you to buy such insurance!

lol


24 posted on 03/07/2019 6:06:16 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson