Posted on 02/22/2019 7:39:22 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Her fat ass could still get the slammer from on-going investigations into Clinton Foundation/Uranium One/State Dept. Pay to Play.
Laws are only for the chumps, not them.
/////////////////////////////////////////////
We cannot allow the example of the Clintons getting off.
It is not a joke.
Allowing arrogant liberals to flaunt their breaking of the law and remain liberal icons beloved like the Obamas later is NOT acceptable.
We must not let that stand.
I faintly remember tens of thousands around the country saying of Hillary:
LOCK HER UP
“It’s not too late.”
Hopefully not, but I wonder what the statue of limitations is?
The whole argument, by Baker, Comey et al is nonsensical. The law in question does not require intent. It only requires the fact of mishandling of classified. Intent is pretty obvious, by shrillery and her people. Their actions make it clear.
Many people have been convicted of the same law over the past twenty years, with no requirement to show intent.
Odd, the whole damn country thinks she should be in prison too. Nice to hear the general counsel is on the same page.
“That hasn’t stopped them from charging thousands of others.”
Try innocently bringing an eagle feather home.
Orange becomes her.
Intent isn’t required under the law in question. Any attempt to give her a pass based on “intent” is nothing short of a lie.
This is the result of the democrats filling as many government agencies and positions with democrats as they could. It’s also part of why the Republicans are known as the stupid party, as they watched it happen over decades, and did nothing. When democrats can’t win elections fairly, election boards and judges can do the job. It’s why democrats are never held accountable for wrongdoing, unless they go against their party. But Republicans can be prosecuted with phony charges. The percentage of government employees who are democrat is hugely disproportionate. It’s why the GOP acts like the lapdog for democrats, they realize they have no power, and moved over to the darkside.
You are correct.
Her intent was premeditated when she established the illegal server to circumvent government oversight.
“... if there had been more evidence Clinton had intended to skirt the law...”
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Huh? and WTF?
So Baker outs himself as another LIAR.
How could they have decided there was not enough evidence? There was actually TOO MUCH evidence.
So Baker’s life and that of his family must have been ______________ (fill in the blank).
So I can rob a bank and not get prosecuted if I state that didn't intend to, it was an accident?
Then, money changed hands??
Intent merely means that she intended to use a non-government server. It doesn’t matter if she knew it was right or wrong, or whether the material should be classified.
The only way to have no intent would be if she was duped into thinking that clintonemail.com was a gov’t maintained and operated domain.
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/general-vs-specific-intent.html
Intent has NO baring; she either broke the law or she did not.
One more slimey spineless swamp eel.
"LOCK HER UP!"
Remind me about the timing of getting talked out of his initial determination and Bill Clinton’s famous tarmac meeting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.